This site is intended for Healthcare professionals only.

IRIA challenges HC judgement on ultrasound practice in Supreme Court

IRIA challenges HC judgement on ultrasound practice in Supreme Court

Indian Radiological and Imaging Association, IRIA, the association of radiologists in the country, has knocked the doors of the Supreme Court challenging the recent decision of high court that had declared the Rule 3(3)(1)(b) of the PNDT Rules ultravires, thereby removing the mandatory six months training that was earlier required to be able to perform an ultrasound under the ambit of law.

READ ALSO : Delhi High Court Judgement clarifies who can do an ultrasound

The judgement had a huge impact on the medical fraternity, by removing the restrictions on the legal rules of the performance of ultrasound, thereby allowing even MBBS doctors to make use of the modality. The judgement seemed to have become a bone of contention between the specialists and generalists in the medical community, with many radioloigsts opposing the decision. This finally culminated in IRIA  filing a review petition against the said judgement in the apex Court.

The major contention of the IRIA stems from the claim that an M.B.B.S course does not provide adequate training to a practitioner to be able to perform an ultrasound. In an earlier interview with Medical Dialogues team , Dr OP Bansal, President IRIA had explained ” No training pertaining to ultrasound is being taught or prescribed in syllabus of MBBS and merely 10-15 days lectures are held in radiology as part of medicine subject in MBBS. The MBBS graduates are taught basic concepts in Radiology and a simple MBBS holder cannot perform an ultrasound, etc until he has a requisite training.”

As is evident with the numerous RTIs filed by IRIA with the Medical Council, ultrasound is a part of the curriculum of Radiology. In the case before the hon’ble high court, Union of India was found to be submitting an affidavit clarifying that the

MCI Act recognises the medical qualification of Doctor of Medicine M.D. (Radio Diagnosis) which is registered as M.D. (Radio Diagnosis) / Diploma in Radio Diagnosis (DMRD) and that imaging techniques and ultrasonography is a critical part of the discipline of M.D. (Radiology) / DMRD to equip a medical professional to practice, teach and do research in the broad discipline of radiology including ultrasound……

MCI had submitted guidelines enumerating the minimum criteria regarding qualification, training, accreditation of training institutes, for determining who should be recognized as qualified to undertake ultrasound test and have valid registration under the PNDT Act.

Following the same, IRIA has demanded a structured practice of ultrasound by qualified radiologists as per the guidelines of MCI.

Another issue highlighted by the organisation relates to the misuse of ultrasound machine in the process of sex determination. Speaking to Medical Dialogues Team, Dr OP Bansal, President IRIA as well as the representative of the organisation in the Central Supervisory Board elaborated, “More than 85% of the violations today under the PC-PNDT act are done by non-radiologists. The aim of the Act was to restrict the use of ultrasound machine by allowing use thereof only by qualified individuals, who could be monitored, however with the recent changes, the same seems to have had an opposite effect of enlarging the category of persons authorized to use and operate ultrasound machine.”


Source: self
20 comment(s) on IRIA challenges HC judgement on ultrasound practice in Supreme Court

Share your Opinion Disclaimer

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Most Voted
  1. user
    Dr Pradeep Tiwari December 17, 2016, 6:29 pm

    Ultrasound pracitce by non radiogists should be strictly discouraged..I mean should be banned

  2. Radiologist in UK find it very funny when radiologist are crying for not allowing medical graduate to do sonography . European union or USA – wherever you go , the Ultrasound technicians are doing it . Also critical care people are trained to do so .
    Also I would like to state what mindset have those people managing to get radiology degree or diploma . Were they that down and incompetent to basic knowledge after their MBBS .

  3. user
    Dr Sahith Reddy July 21, 2017, 1:14 pm

    Done by technicians and sent to to radiologists so that they report

  4. will some body upload case no .

  5. user
    Tarlochan singh April 13, 2017, 2:34 pm

    11046 ( 2016)

  6. will some body upload case no .

  7. user
    Dr Ramakant shukla July 15, 2016, 10:33 am

    What is the current status of court case in SC

  8. Sir any news regarding status and case number

  9. We have roughly 8000 to 9000 radiologists to cater to the need of 123 crore population. There r specialist from other fields too who require usg in there respective fields. For usg guided blocks anesthetist will not wait for radiologists to assist him in ot. Nor will a surgeon in civil hospitals to diagnose acute cholecystitis or renal colic if there is no radiologists. And these r basics usg.yes for level 2 scan or colour dopplers foetal needs spl apply stiches minor surgical operations. Mbbs do it well and some do major common surgery restrict a non invasive machine to a particular dept is not a gud practical decision.drs serving in periphery with no radiologist nearby will find it difficult if not impossible to treat patients. So if good sense prevail this tug of war should find a sensible end and should not remain an ego problem between different faculties of medicine.

  10. There is acute short of doctors in rural area…so do u think will give permission to quacks to practice medicine( noninvasive)?it\’s bogus. We should increase radiology sits in pg. U can not compromise specialist sevice in name of shortage. Mci standard should be marks….otherwise system will fall.according to u homeopath/ayurved/unani doc will do usg practice? Barbar should do surgery practice legally?

  11. sad that MBBS are like barbar for you . what about radiologists doing echo-cardigraphy

  12. user
    Dr Pradeep Tiwari December 17, 2016, 6:34 pm

    Very well saidsunit..I m agree with you