This site is intended for Healthcare professionals only.

Legality of Doctors Strike: Petition filed in Supreme Court

Legality of Doctors Strike: Petition filed in Supreme Court

A special leave petition has been filed with the Supreme Court challenging the recent Judgement of Allahabad High Court that had implied that Strikes by the medical fraternity working in government hospitals would be construed as illegal and would call for harsh penalties against the striking doctors.

In the month of June , coming down hard on the doctors under the King George Medical University (KGMU) who had gone on strike to oppose new changes in the PG admissions in the state, the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court has asked the authorities to penalize the striking doctors for causing undue harassment to patients.

Read more: Illegal For Doctors to go on strike : High Court 

The hon’ble court had then observed

Doctors in State Medical Colleges, Government Hospitals and similar other institutions funded by State from public exchequer have no legal or other right to deny to discharge their duties as doctor i.e. administration of medical treatment etc. to the patients. Any such action on their part would be patently illegal and would justify a serious action against them as permissible in law which would include denial of salary or allowance or honorarium etc. as the case may be. Further such activities of abstention, protest, strike etc. amounts to a serious misconduct justifying major penalty and also criminal and tortuous liability if any patient suffer on account of such action of such a doctor.

Protesting the judgement on behalf of the medical profession, Medico-Legal Action Group, a registered Trust concerned with medico-legal issues has filed an appeal with the Apex Court. The petitioner has stated that the high court has based its judgement based on unverified newspaper reports and was impugned in light of various Supreme court Orders on doctors strikes.

Speaking to Medical Dialogues team, Dr Neeraj Nagpal, Convenor, Medicos  Legal  Action  Group told Medical Dialogues team, “The question of strike by doctors has come up before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the past and the Hon’ble Court has held that it cannot pass orders that under any circumstances, doctors should not proceed on strike. The impugned judgment has the effect of violating the earlier orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in this regard. If the impugned order by a Division Bench of the High Court is not set aside, it would act as a precedent and would result in perpetuation of various illegalities “

Matter is tentatively listed for 24th October,2016

Source: self
13 comment(s) on Legality of Doctors Strike: Petition filed in Supreme Court

Share your Opinion Disclaimer

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Most Voted
  1. What the hell iz going in our country? There was the time when doctors were treated like a God. And now…… Now a days parents/ relatives r becoming more &more cruel. They treat doctor like there own property. Beating doctors /harming them/kicking them out of there place should be stopped. What the government is doing ? They should take some strict action on this matter. And some facility should be provided to the doctors for there self defence with immediate effect. because of few doctors this profession is shamed. Why should all suffer because of those few one. Instead of identifying those we are blaming all. When we need them we appreciate them and when we not we harm them. We should never forget that they r giving there full to u all not even there families. Ur children\’s meet them but they don\’t meet there own children for days. U come to doctor with full of stomach and they don\’t even get time to have a glass of water. There is a strong need to watch ur chime instead of blaming others. A big Shame on us.

  2. user
    Dr Ramesh Vardhan November 3, 2016, 10:28 am

    Delay is Deny , specially when it comes to delivering the Judgement. It is a common scene to see the chief Justice of India crying before the Tv cameras for not appointing/delay in appointment of Judges. Due to which there is undue stress,tension and WORRY on the PART of sitting Judges. Mainly due to lack of adequate time, knowledge and help to refer for the proper analysis of proceeding/ papers properly.Unlike advocates judges may not be having assistants to refer the judicial books.Hence like any other Human beings Judges too are prone for making mistakes ( Definitely they are not super Humans.Being in isolation they are more likely to suffer from stress related disorders)

  3. user
    Virender Siwatch October 15, 2016, 1:31 pm

    This is very unfortunate the judges hav become very high headed.v must condemn the decision in strongest words

  4. I agree with Dr. Neeraj and others. The medical profession has to be taken seriously and the individual rights and dignities of its members should be protected. A doctor irrespective of his qualification is not someone to be kicked around,according to everybody\’s whims and fancies. Any ruling against doctors\’ protesting has to be opposed vehemently and collectively. It is well understood that our\’s is a noble profession, but we too have feelings and sentiments.

  5. Agar asli baap ke ho to armyman ko thappad maar kar dekho.Does human rights not apply for doctor PGs.Don\’t other college PG students go on strike or mass bunk.When patients die on road due to road jam and or political rallies who is penalised.Hai kisi ke baap mein dam jo in par ban laga de