This site is intended for Healthcare professionals only.

NCDRC overturnes Rs 23 lakh medical negligence order on Apollo Hospitals

NCDRC overturnes Rs 23 lakh medical negligence order on Apollo Hospitals

Chennai: In a major move, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) has overturned an order given by the Tamil Nadu state consumer commission, as per which the Apollo Hospital and its doctor were mandated to pay a fine of Rs. 23 Lakh to the parents of a deceased patient on account of medical negligence

The case was that of a 12 year boy,R M Vijaram, who was admitted to Apollo Speciality Hospital, Chennai under the care of Dr Revathy Raj. The doctor diagnosed the patient as suffering from advanced stage leukemia and initiated chemotherapy on the patient.

Soon after in December 16, 2008, the patient underwent a Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplant at the hospital. Unfortunately, the patient didn’t survive long and died on April 17, 2009. The father of the patient approached the state commission, alleging medical negligence on the part of the hospital.

Muthukrishnan, the father of the deceased alleged that the doctor compelled him to give consent for a bone marrow transplant on the boy. He further added that the doctors at the hospital did not perform any findings relating the possibility of a virus called cytomegalovirus in the early stage. The test, however, according to him was done at the later stage, after which infectious disease specialist from the hospital prescribed a medicine that was not even available with the hospital pharmacy.

Another allegation made against the doctor, was that he was travelling abroad from April 10th to April 17, 2009 , leaving the patient without proper care.

The state consumer forum, after hearing, directed the doctor and the hospital, to pay a compensation of Rs 23 lakhs to the family of the deceased on account of medical negligence. The hospital soon approached the NCDRC challenging the said judgement .

The hospital in its statement said that soon after the boy was diagnosed with the disease the family of the patient was tested for matching stem cells but none of the family members’ stem cells matched with the patient. Thus the hospital carried a worldwide research for cord and marrow donors for six months which also failed as no match was found. After all these sequential efforts by the hospital high risk identical stem cell transplant was advised on the patient.

The Hon’ble court comprising the bench of  Justice AJIT BHARIHOKE and DR. S. M. KANTIKAR,   observed

 In the instant case, extensive search was made by OP for matching BMT but no matching donor was identified. Therefore, the expert opinion of Prof. Mammen Chandy from CMC Vellore was also sought for Haploidentical BMT. As per the medical literature, Haploidentical BMT is novel procedure where mismatch stem cells are treated with monoclonal anti bodies to prevent graft vs. host diseases – a dreaded complication of mismatch transplantation. The over all survival rate in the cases of Haploidentical BMT is 5 to 10 %. The death of the patient was due to number of known complications, which are consequences of BMT.

The court then set aside the order of the state commission and dismissed the case stating  “In our considered view, there was no medical negligence either in the procedure of BMT or in the care during post BMT complication “

You can read the full judgement below


5 comment(s) on NCDRC overturnes Rs 23 lakh medical negligence order on Apollo Hospitals

Share your Opinion Disclaimer

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Most Voted
  1. The negligence claimed by the bereaved was on three counts:
    1. Virology test was done late by six months.
    2. Doctor was traveling during a crucial week, without appointing a replacement doctor.
    3. Medicine prescribed were not available in the hospital store.
    The Court has totally ignored these three points and given judgement on some other points which were not even part of the complaint. This is absurd.

  2. Judicial negligence, Hospital should file a case against the judge for not studying the case and creating so much stress and also should pay damages monetary for the defamation caused by this.

  3. Very true Sir. Even media spares no opportunity to make headlines of a death in a hospital and criminalises it as a negligence case. Something must be done. Else we will be soft targets

  4. Can this be taken up as judicial negligence I think high time judiciary is also made responsible for its doings

  5. What if anyone can not approach the NCDRC ?
    What about the wrong decision of state consumer commission?
    Facts and evidences are same for both the commissions then why the two decisions are contrary to each other

Source: With inputs

Featured Jobs

View all medical jobs at ➤

Opinion Polls

Should Government Doctors be allowed to do Private Practice?