- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Bombay High Court slams government on NORI issue
In response to the Writ Petition filed by MARD in the Aurangabad bench of Bombay high court, calling government's decision not to issue NORI certificate to doctors unconstitutional, the judges took cognisance of the points raised by MARD. Asking pointed questions to the advocate of Union of India, the honourable judges raised the points on whether the government is in position to provide jobs...
The high court Suo Moto has made Medical Council of India, a party respondent to this petition and is reported to have given 7 days time to both Union of India and the MCI to file a reply affidavit. Additionally, the court ordered to delete the name of the health minister as one of the parties to the petition as he is not a necessary party to the present petition
The final decision is yet reserved an the bench has given the next date of hearing after 4 weeks
MARD had earlier filed a writ petition challenging the governments decision not to Issue NORI certificate to doctors willing to go abroad with an exception of those above 65 years of age. The decision has not gone well with the medical community with objections coming from many doctors
Meghna A Singhania is the founder and Editor-in-Chief at Medical Dialogues. An Economics graduate from Delhi University and a post graduate from London School of Economics and Political Science, her key research interest lies in health economics, and policy making in health and medical sector in the country.She is a member of the Association of Healthcare Journalists. She can be contacted at editorial@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751