This site is intended for Healthcare professionals.

5 eminent doctors selected for NEW MCI oversight committee, Check out Details

................................ Advertisement ................................

medical dialogues

The doctors who will be part of the new panel are: Dr VK Paul, Dr Nikhil Tandon, Dr Jagat Ram, Dr BN Gandharan and Dr Randeep Guleria. The panel is to be notified on Tuesday itself.

New Delhi :  The Supreme Court today allowed the Centre to replace the oversight committee set up to supervise the functioning of the Medical Coucil of India (MCI) with a fresh panel of five eminent doctors.

A five-judge Constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar, said the Centre had proposed the names of five eminent doctors to replace the oversight committee whose term had just expired.

................................ Advertisement ................................

The five new members, who will constitute the over sight committee are

  1. Dr. V.K. Paul, Professor & Head, Paediatrics, AIIMS, New Delhi
  2. Dr. Randeep Guleria, Director, AIIMS, New Delhi
  3. Dr. Jagat Ram, Director, PGIMER, Chandigarh
  4. Dr. BN Gangadharan, Director, NIMHANS, Bengaluru
  5. Dr. Nikhil Tandon, Professor & Head, Endocrinology, AIIMS, New Delhi.

“The doctors proposed are all outstanding people. We are satisfied with the names,” the bench, also comprising Justices J Chelameswar, R K Agrawal, D Y Chandrachud and S Abdul Nazeer, said.

................................ Advertisement ................................

It also gave the Centre liberty to replace any doctor in the list with another if he does not wish to be a part of the oversight committee.

The bench had yesterday asked the Centre to constitute a panel which would replace the oversight committee set up last year by the apex court to oversee the MCIs functioning till the government put in place an alternate mechanism.

The committee, set up by the court on May 2 last year, was to function for a period of one year or till a suitable mechanism was brought in by the Centre to substitute it.

During the hearing, senior lawyer Kapil Sibal, appearing for some medical colleges, had told the bench that till date, no alternative mechanism had been put in place by the Centre despite the fact that the oversight panel was to function for only one year or till a suitable mechanism was evolved.

He had argued that the MCI was bound by directions of the oversight committee but the council was not adhering to them.

Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, had said the tenure of the oversight committee should be extended by one more year or till the time the Centre comes out with a mechanism to deal with the issues relating to the MCIs functioning.

The apex court had on July 13 agreed to set up a five- judge constitution bench to deal with the matter after Rohatgi had said it was an urgent matter as counselling for admissions in MBBS and BDS was underway.

The Centre had earlier told the apex court that it had taken steps to put the alternative mechanism in place and there was no need now for the oversight committee to continue.

MCI had contended that the directions of the constitution bench which had set up the oversight committee were based on certain material which could not be controverted at the time of the order. PTI SJK RRT MIN

Some of the functions of the Oversight committee, as recorded by the Supreme Court in its order, are as follows:

(a) the Oversight Committee will have the authority to oversee the functioning of Medical Council of India.

b) all decisions/recommendations of the MCI will require approval of the Oversight Committee before they are communicated to the Central Government.

c) the Oversight Committee will be free to issue appropriate remedial directions for improvement in the functioning of MCI.

d) the Oversight Committee will function till the Central Government puts in place any other appropriate mechanism, or until further orders.

Read Also : Constitute committee to Oversee MCI or we will: Supreme Court Slams Centre



................................ Advertisement ................................

Source: with inputs

6 comment(s) on 5 eminent doctors selected for NEW MCI oversight committee, Check out Details

Share your Opinion Disclaimer

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Most Voted
  1. user
    DR M M A FARIDI July 20, 2017, 11:36 pm

    The suggested panel of the doctors for oversight committee is excellent. There are many medical institutions in the country which are managed by the trusts and deemed universities. It would be useful to include one representative from among them also. It will help understand their perspective and improve relations between MCI and management of the private institutions, which are mired by mistrust and litigation. After all country requires adequate numbers and well trained doctors. And public and private institutions must fulfill this need together.

  2. user
    DR ARVIND KR. GUPTA July 20, 2017, 10:59 am


  3. user
    Dr Amitav Banerjee July 19, 2017, 10:38 pm

    To begin with they should first amend the unrealistic publication requirements for medical teachers. MCI inspectors keep nit picking and harassing faculty on publications. For instance case reports are not accepted. Only first and second authors (now amended to first and corresponding authors) to be given credit for publications. The fact is all authors get equal credit universally. The i10 index and H index are calculated irrespective of the sequence in the authors list. Why this ruling on publication by MCI. Another issue is only some indexing bodies are recognized based on whims and fancies of babus sitting at MCI. Reputed indexing bodies such as EBSCO or DOAJ still do not find mention in the approved index list. Again some inspectors insist on \”Society Journals\” – how do you define society? or \”Specialty Journals\” only. By this criteria even Lancet, BMJ, NEJM and so on will not meet the narrow limits of MCI requirments!!

  4. Sadly messed up.

  5. user
    Dr Rahul Sarda July 19, 2017, 4:00 pm

    3 out of 5 names are from AIIMS,
    & ALL from government colleges.

    It should have been a larger committee of 9 members, with equal representation from government medical colleges, private medical colleges , government rural posted doctors, doctors from corporate hospitals and solo practice doctors , from ACROSS India.
    So that problems could be understood better & solved better
    So that they understood