Airway ultrasound superior to traditional clinical parameters for predicting difficult laryngoscopy, suggests study
Assessment of the airway is crucial for managing airways effectively. Ultrasound has increasingly become a viable alternative for evaluating airways. Recent research paper aims to assess the accuracy of various clinical and ultrasonographic parameters in predicting difficult laryngoscopy in the emergency department. The primary objective is to determine the accuracy of ultrasonography parameters compared to Cormack-Lehane grading in predicting difficult laryngoscopy in adults. The secondary objective is to assess the accuracy of clinical parameters compared to Cormack-Lehane grading in predicting difficult laryngoscopy in adults.
Study Design and Procedure
The study will be a prospective cross-sectional study involving 62 adult patients over 18 years who come to the emergency department and require endotracheal intubation. An emergency medicine physician will perform an ultrasonographic examination of the upper airway, measuring the skin-to-epiglottis distance and tongue thickness using a GE Healthcare ultrasound. Clinical airway assessment will also be conducted using the LEMON criteria. A trained emergency medicine physician, unaware of the clinical and ultrasound airway parameters, will perform a laryngoscopy and record the Cormack-Lehane grading. The study is expected to provide insights into the comparative effectiveness of airway ultrasound versus conventional clinical parameters in predicting difficult laryngoscopy within an emergency department setting. Airway ultrasound has demonstrated significant potential due to its real-time imaging capabilities and ability to visualize anatomical structures that may not be readily accessible through clinical examination alone. Ultrasound parameters such as the distance from the skin to the epiglottis and the anterior neck soft tissue thickness at the level of the hyoid bone and vocal cords have been shown to be effective in predicting difficult laryngoscopy.
Hypothesis and Conclusion
The researchers hypothesize that airway ultrasound may offer superior predictive value compared to traditional clinical parameters. The integration of ultrasound into airway assessment protocols could revolutionize the approach to managing airways in the emergency department, ensuring that patients receive the best possible care even in the most challenging situations. The conclusion of the study will be drawn regarding the correlation between ultrasound parameters, Cormack-Lehane grading, and clinical parameters in predicting difficult laryngoscopy.
Key Points
1. The primary objective is to determine the accuracy of ultrasonography parameters compared to Cormack-Lehane grading in predicting difficult laryngoscopy in adults.
2. The secondary objective is to assess the accuracy of clinical parameters compared to Cormack-Lehane grading in predicting difficult laryngoscopy in adults.
3. The study is a prospective cross-sectional study involving 62 adult patients over 18 years who come to the emergency department and require endotracheal intubation.
4. An emergency medicine physician will perform an ultrasonographic examination of the upper airway, measuring the skin-to-epiglottis distance and tongue thickness, and a clinical airway assessment using the LEMON criteria.
5. The researchers hypothesize that airway ultrasound may offer superior predictive value compared to traditional clinical parameters in predicting difficult laryngoscopy.
6. The conclusion of the study will be drawn regarding the correlation between ultrasound parameters, Cormack-Lehane grading, and clinical parameters in predicting difficult laryngoscopy.
Reference -
Kadadi S, Gadkari C, Pundkar A (September 16, 2024) A Comparison of Airway Ultrasound and Clinical Parameters for Predicting Difficult Laryngoscopy in the Emergency Department: A Study Protocol. Cureus 16(9): e69543. DOI 10.7759/cureus.69543
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.