'Cracking' technology may reduce environmental impact of nitrous oxide used during labor

Written By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-10-02 17:15 GMT   |   Update On 2022-10-02 17:19 GMT
Advertisement

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is used extensively to manage pain during labour.Compared to an equivalent mass of carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide has 265 times the global warming potential.

According to a study conducted by a multidisciplinary team of anaesthetists and midwives, from St John's Hospital, Livingston, UK and Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK, 'cracking' technology may reduce the environmental impact of nitrous oxide (N2O), used extensively to manage pain during labour.

Advertisement

The study has been published in the journal Anaesthesia.

All inhaled anaesthetic gases in common use today are greenhouse gases. Compared to an equivalent mass of carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide has 265 times the global warming potential. Nitrous oxide, the painkilling component of 'gas and air', is the most frequently used labour painkiller in the UK, and is available in all birth settings. Thus, any intervention that reduces nitrous oxide release into the atmosphere has the potential to significantly reduce the environmental impact of this medication.

One method which may reduce the carbon footprint of nitrous oxide is to break down ('crack') the exhaled gas into nitrogen and oxygen using a catalyst. Previous research has established the efficiency of this process-however, to be effective in practice, as much exhaled nitrous oxide as possible must be 'scavenged' (captured) so that it can be broken down. This relies on patients being able to consistently breathe out into a mask or mouthpiece.

In this quality improvement project, based on environmental monitoring and staff feedback, the authors assessed the impact of nitrous oxide cracking technology in the maternity setting. Nitrous oxide levels were recorded during the final 30 minutes of uncomplicated labour in 36 cases. In the first 12 cases, readings were taken without the use of the technology to establish a baseline.

Subsequently, the study team introduced the cracking device, and took a stepwise approach to optimising its clinical use. This involved using a mouthpiece, then two different types of facemask, and providing patients with tips for use and feedback.

The results showed that median ambient nitrous oxide levels were 71% lower than baseline when using a mouthpiece, and 81% lower when using a low-profile facemask (a lightweight facemask with a flexible seal) together with coaching on how best to use it. The authors say: "Given that a similar magnitude of reduction in nitrous oxide levels was seen with mouthpieces and low-profile facemasks, we suggest that pregnant women should be offered the option of either device when cracking is used.

Education for pregnant women and choice in use of device is vital given the high degree of co-operation required [for the successful use of the technology], and this is consistent with guidelines for choice and personalised care in maternity services.

Future research to better characterise the optimal use of this technology could focus on investigating other delivery device types, and considering the optimal timing and method of education-for example, is the antenatal clinic a better place to discuss this technology than during the birth period?"

The authors note that they attempted to avoid burdening pregnant women with 'climate guilt' during their labour; for example by making it clear that greenhouse gas emissions associated with nitrous oxide are the responsibility of the healthcare organisation-rather than of the patients.

They add: "Staff feedback was generally positive, though some found the technology to be cumbersome; successful implementation relies on effective staff engagement. Our results indicate that cracking technology can reduce ambient nitrous oxide levels in the obstetric setting, with potential for reductions in environmental impacts and occupational exposure."

Reference:

A Pinder, L Fang, A Fieldhouse, A Goddard, R Lovett, J Khan-Perez, K Maclennan, E Mason, T MacCarrick, C Shelton, PMID: 36108342 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15838


Tags:    
Article Source : Anaesthesia

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News