General Anesthesia as good as Sedation during Intraarterial Treatment for Stroke: Study
It is speculated that the anaesthetic strategy during endovascular therapy for stroke may have an impact on the outcome of the patients. The authors hypothesized that conscious sedation is associated with a better functional outcome 3 months after endovascular therapy for the treatment of stroke compared with general anaesthesia. In this single-blind, randomized trial, patients received either standardized general anaesthesia or standardized conscious sedation. Blood pressure control was also standardized in both groups. The primary outcome measure was a modified Rankin score less than or equal to 2 (0 = no symptoms; 5 = severe disability) assessed 3 months after treatment. The main secondary outcomes were complications, mortality, reperfusion results, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scores on days 1 and 7.
The results of the study are:
- Of 351 randomized patients, 345 were included in the analysis.
- The primary outcome occurred in 129 of 341 (38%) of the patients: 63 (36%) in the conscious sedation group and 66 (40%) in the general anaesthesia group
- Patients in the general anaesthesia group experienced more intraoperative hypo- or hypertensive episodes, while the cumulative duration was not different (mean ± SD, 36 ± 31 vs. 39 ± 25 min; P = 0.079).
- The time from the onset and from arrival to puncture was longer in the general anaesthesia group while the time from onset to recanalization was similar in both groups.
- Recanalization was more often successful in the general anaesthesia group
- The incidence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was similar in both groups.
Thus, the functional outcomes 3 months after endovascular treatment for stroke were similar to general anaesthesia and sedation. Our results, therefore, suggest that clinicians can use either approach.
Reference:
General Anesthesia versus Sedation, Both with Hemodynamic Control, during Intraarterial Treatment for Stroke: The GASS Randomized Trial by Axelle Maurice, et al. published in the Preoperative Medicine.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004142
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.