Intraoperative autologous transfusion for scoliosis surgery a reliable option
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common spinal deformity, and posterior instrumentation and fusion is a common method for treating AIS. However, the operation is complicated and causes massive intraoperative blood loss upto 650–2,839 mL. Intraoperative autologous transfusion (IAT) is in practice for scoliosis surgery for decades; however, its cost-effectiveness remains debatable.
BMC Anesthesiology reports a review that estimated the cost-effectiveness and blood loss in Intraoperative autologous transfusion (IAT) was effective as it was related to the volume of blood loss, and when the blood loss volume was less than 1,500 mL, IAT was cost-effective, drastically reducing the demand for allogeneic RBC and total RBC transfusion cost.
The researchers reviewed medical records of 402 patients who underwent AIS surgery. The patients were divided into different groups according to the intraoperative blood loss volume (group A: ≥500 to < 1000 mL, B: ≥1,000 to < 1,500 mL, and C: ≥1,500 mL) and whether IAT was used (i.e., IAT and no-IAT groups). The volume of blood loss, volume of transfused allogeneic red blood cells (RBC), and RBC transfusion costs were analysed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the independent risk factors of massive intraoperative blood loss (≥ 1,000 mL and ≥ 1,500 mL). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyse the cut-off values of the factors contributing to massive intraoperative blood loss.
The key findings of the review are
• In group A, no significant difference was observed in the volume of allogeneic RBC transfused during and after procedure between the IAT and no-IAT groups; however, total RBC transfusion costs was significantly higher in the IAT group.
• In groups B and C, the patients in the IAT group compared with those in the no-IAT group had a lower volume of allogeneic RBC transfused during the operation and on the first day after the operation.
• However, in group B, the total RBC transfusion cost in the patients who used IAT was significantly higher. In group C, total RBC transfusion cost in the patients who used IAT was significantly lower.
• The number of fused vertebral levels and Ponte osteotomy were found to be independent risk factors for massive intraoperative blood loss.
• ROC analysis showed that more than eight and 10 fused vertebral levels predicted ≥ 1,000 mL and ≥ 1,500 mL intraoperative blood loss, respectively.
The researchers concluded that “The cost-effectiveness of IAT in AIS was related to the volume of blood loss, and when the blood loss volume was ≥ 1,500 mL, IAT was cost-effective, drastically reducing the demand for allogeneic RBC and total RBC transfusion cost. The number of fused vertebral levels and Ponte osteotomy were independent risk factors for massive intraoperative blood loss.”
Reference: Chi, W., Luo, Z., Wu, Z. et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of intraoperative autologous transfusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a single-centre retrospective study. BMC Anesthesiol 23, 211 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02180-3
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.