Nasal Intubation tied to reduced fentanyl consumption and earlier extubation among Children after Cardiac Surgery
A recent study by Ibrahim Abdelbaser compared the outcomes of oral and nasal intubation in neonates and infants undergoing open cardiac surgery and the findings revealed that nasal intubation had several advantages over oral intubation, including reduced postoperative fentanyl consumption and earlier extubation and oral feeding. The findings were published in Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia.
The randomized, controlled, open-label study involved 220 infants and neonates who underwent cardiac surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to either oral or nasal intubation. The primary outcome measure was postoperative fentanyl consumption (µg/kg/h) among the intubated patients.
The results showed that nasal intubation led to significantly lower postoperative fentanyl consumption compared to oral intubation. The mean fentanyl consumption was 0.53±0.48 µg/kg/h in the nasal intubation group, while it was 0.82±0.20 µg/kg/h in the oral intubation group.
Additionally, nasal intubation demonstrated other benefits. The study found that the nasal group experienced a shorter time needed for intubation and a lower increase in heart rate during the procedure. Furthermore, the incidence of inadvertent intraoperative extubation was significantly higher in the oral intubation group.
Nasal intubation also led to a shorter time to extubation and a shorter stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Moreover, the time to the onset of full oral feeding was significantly shorter in the nasal intubation group.
Importantly, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of hospital stay duration or the incidence of postoperative complications such as pneumonia or surgical wound infection.
These findings indicate that nasal intubation provides better outcomes for children undergoing cardiac surgery. It reduces postoperative fentanyl consumption, promotes earlier extubation, lowers the risk of accidental extubation, and facilitates earlier full oral feeding. The study's results will likely impact clinical practice, guiding healthcare professionals toward the use of nasal intubation in similar cases to improve patient outcomes.
Source:
Abdelbaser, I., Abourezk, A. R., Magdy, M., Elnegerey, N., Sabry, R., Tharwat, M., & Sayedalahl, M. (2023). Comparison of the outcomes of oral versus nasal endotracheal intubation in neonates and infants undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled study. In Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2023.07.006
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.