Nasal Intubation tied to reduced fentanyl consumption and earlier extubation among Children after Cardiac Surgery

Written By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-07-12 15:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-07-12 15:30 GMT

A recent study by Ibrahim Abdelbaser compared the outcomes of oral and nasal intubation in neonates and infants undergoing open cardiac surgery and the findings revealed that nasal intubation had several advantages over oral intubation, including reduced postoperative fentanyl consumption and earlier extubation and oral feeding. The findings were published in Journal of Cardiothoracic...

Login or Register to read the full article

A recent study by Ibrahim Abdelbaser compared the outcomes of oral and nasal intubation in neonates and infants undergoing open cardiac surgery and the findings revealed that nasal intubation had several advantages over oral intubation, including reduced postoperative fentanyl consumption and earlier extubation and oral feeding. The findings were published in Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia.

The randomized, controlled, open-label study involved 220 infants and neonates who underwent cardiac surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to either oral or nasal intubation. The primary outcome measure was postoperative fentanyl consumption (µg/kg/h) among the intubated patients.

The results showed that nasal intubation led to significantly lower postoperative fentanyl consumption compared to oral intubation. The mean fentanyl consumption was 0.53±0.48 µg/kg/h in the nasal intubation group, while it was 0.82±0.20 µg/kg/h in the oral intubation group.

Additionally, nasal intubation demonstrated other benefits. The study found that the nasal group experienced a shorter time needed for intubation and a lower increase in heart rate during the procedure. Furthermore, the incidence of inadvertent intraoperative extubation was significantly higher in the oral intubation group.

Nasal intubation also led to a shorter time to extubation and a shorter stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Moreover, the time to the onset of full oral feeding was significantly shorter in the nasal intubation group.

Importantly, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of hospital stay duration or the incidence of postoperative complications such as pneumonia or surgical wound infection.

These findings indicate that nasal intubation provides better outcomes for children undergoing cardiac surgery. It reduces postoperative fentanyl consumption, promotes earlier extubation, lowers the risk of accidental extubation, and facilitates earlier full oral feeding. The study's results will likely impact clinical practice, guiding healthcare professionals toward the use of nasal intubation in similar cases to improve patient outcomes.

Source:

Abdelbaser, I., Abourezk, A. R., Magdy, M., Elnegerey, N., Sabry, R., Tharwat, M., & Sayedalahl, M. (2023). Comparison of the outcomes of oral versus nasal endotracheal intubation in neonates and infants undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled study. In Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2023.07.006

Tags:    
Article Source : Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News