Paravertebral and Erector Spinae Blocks Effective in Preventing Postherpetic Neuralgia, claims study

Written By :  Dr Riya Dave
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-04-09 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2024-04-10 06:35 GMT

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) remains a challenging condition to manage effectively in clinical practice. Recently, paravertebral block (PVB) and erector spinae block (ESPB) have emerged as novel techniques for treating acute herpes zoster (AHZ) and potentially preventing its progression to PHN. A recent study was published in the Journal Of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology. The study...

Login or Register to read the full article

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) remains a challenging condition to manage effectively in clinical practice. Recently, paravertebral block (PVB) and erector spinae block (ESPB) have emerged as novel techniques for treating acute herpes zoster (AHZ) and potentially preventing its progression to PHN. A recent study was published in the Journal Of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology. The study was conducted by Patil A. and colleagues.

PHN, a debilitating complication of herpes zoster, is characterized by persistent neuropathic pain following the resolution of the acute rash. Conventional treatments often provide inadequate relief, prompting the exploration of alternative interventions such as regional nerve blocks like PVB and ESPB.

In a prospective randomized controlled study, 60 patients with AHZ-related pain were enrolled and assigned to three groups: Control (standard treatment), PVB (standard treatment with PVB), and ESPB (standard treatment with ESPB). Efficacy was assessed at 15, 30, and 60 days post-treatment, with the primary endpoint being the proportion of patients experiencing adequate pain relief and allodynia resolution.

The key findings of the study were as follows:

• Incidence of PHN post-study: 45% in the ESPB group, 40% in the PVB group, and 80% in the control group (p = 0.022).

• Proportion of patients with pain relief: higher in the PVB group compared to the ESPB group (not statistically significant, p = 0.749).

• Mean pain score on day 60: 2.45 (±3.05) in the ESPB group, 2.15 (±2.7) in the PVB group, and 4.3 (±2.27) in the control group (p = 0.003).

Both PVB and ESPB demonstrated effectiveness in treating AHZ-related pain and preventing its progression to PHN. While the incidence of PHN was lower in both block groups compared to standard treatment alone, the PVB group showed a trend towards superior pain relief.

Paravertebral and erector spinae blocks are promising interventions for managing AHZ-related pain and reducing the risk of developing PHN. These findings suggest that incorporating regional nerve blocks into the treatment regimen may improve outcomes for patients with AHZ. Further research is warranted to validate these results and optimize the use of PVB and ESPB in clinical practice.

Reference:

Patil, A., Vyshnavi, S., Raja, T., Shastry, V., Thammaiah, S. H., & Archana, K. N. (2024). A Randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae block and paravertebral block in preventing postherpetic neuralgia in patients with zoster-associated pain. Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, 10.4103/joacp.joacp_82_23. https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_82_23

Tags:    
Article Source : Journal Of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News