Negligence vs Misconduct: Where Do Medical Councils Draw the Line?

Written By :  Prem Aggarwal
Published On 2025-10-03 05:30 GMT   |   Update On 2025-10-03 05:30 GMT
Advertisement

Medical councils play a crucial role in upholding the dignity and ethics of the medical profession. However, an important debate surrounds the scope of their disciplinary powers - specifically, whether councils can punish doctors for negligence in medical treatment. This article examines the statutory framework, the role of Section 21 of the Delhi Medical Council Act, and landmark judicial decisions. It highlights the distinction between punishable misconduct and mere negligence, thereby clarifying the boundaries of professional accountability.

Advertisement

Medicine is both a science and an art, grounded in trust between doctor and patient. Patients expect competence, diligence, and integrity, while doctors expect protection from unfair allegations when acting in good faith. To preserve this balance, medical councils are entrusted with the duty of maintaining ethical standards and disciplining misconduct.

But the question often arises: Does every allegation of negligence fall within the jurisdiction of medical councils, or only those amounting to professional misconduct?

This is where most of the confusion arises. Patients often believe that any negligence by a doctor should be punishable by the council. Doctors, on the other hand, fear that even an adverse outcome beyond their control may invite disciplinary action.The truth lies somewhere in between. Not every case of negligence is misconduct. But some kinds of negligence are so serious, or so entwined with ethical breaches, that councils cannot ignore them

Role of the Council in Maintaining Ethics and Punishing Misconduct

Medical councils in India, including state councils and the National Medical Commission, are empowered to:

• Safeguard professional ethics.

• Investigate complaints against doctors.

• Take disciplinary action such as warning, suspension, or removal of a practitioner’s name from the register.

Their authority, however, is limited to professional misconduct. They are not meant to serve as consumer forums or civil courts for compensation disputes.

Section 21 of the Delhi Medical Council Act

Section 21 authorizes the Council to inquire into complaints of professional misconduct and take disciplinary action. The scope of inquiry is therefore confined to conduct that violates the Code of Medical Ethics.
The crucial issue: when does negligence amount to misconduct?
Complaints of Negligence
There are situations where negligence clearly crosses into professional misconduct. These inclide
Gross Negligence: Complete disregard for patient safety or established medical norms.
Recklessness or Willful Acts: Performing procedures without consent, using banned drugs, or practicing outside one’s expertise.
Ethical Breaches Coupled with Negligence: Falsifying records, concealing errors, overcharging dishonestly.
• Refusal of Emergency Care without justification.
In such situations, negligence overlaps with ethical violations and becomes punishable misconduct under Section 21.
Negligence Not Punishable as Misconduct

On the other hand, many situations, though painful, do not amount to misconduct. These include

Errors of Judgment in Good Faith: Different doctors may choose different legitimate treatment paths.
Adverse Outcome Despite Due Care: Complications, even death, may occur despite following standard practice.
Simple or Ordinary Negligence without ethical breach:
These are matters for civil courts or consumer forums, not councils.
Treatment Within Accepted Protocols: Choosing one standard option over another cannot be misconduct.
Landmark Judicial Guidance

Courts in India have, time and again, drawn a very clear line between ordinary negligence and misconduct

Jacob Mathew vs. State of Punjab (2005, SC)- Established that criminal liability requires gross negligence. An error of judgment alone does not amount to misconduct.
Dr. Suresh Gupta vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2004, SC)- Reiterated that only negligence of a very high degree, showing recklessness, can invite penal or disciplinary action.
IMA vs. V.P. Shantha (1995, SC)- Brought medical services under the Consumer Protection Act—clarifying that issues of compensation lie with consumer forums, not medical councils.
Anuradha Saha Case (2013, SC)- Awarded record compensation for gross negligence, but also reinforced that professional misconduct is a separate domain overseen by medical councils.
Balancing Accountability and Protection of the Profession
Doctors should be held accountable when they grossly violate ethics or act recklessly. At the same time, they must be protected from being penalized for every adverse outcome or honest error.
• Civil courts handle compensation.
• Criminal courts handle cases of gross or reckless negligence.
• Medical councils discipline ethical breaches amounting to misconduct.
This layered system ensures fairness for both patients and practitioners.
Medical councils can punish doctors for negligence only when it amounts to professional misconduct.
• Punishable Negligence: Gross, reckless, or ethically compromised acts.
• Non-Punishable Negligence: Honest errors, adverse outcomes despite proper care, or management within accepted protocols.
By clearly distinguishing between negligence and misconduct, medical councils preserve both patient welfare and the dignity of the medical profession.

Doctor's Accountability and Protection- Why there is the need for Balance

This balance is critical. Doctors must be held accountable when they grossly violate ethics or act recklessly. Patients deserve that protection. But doctors must also be protected from the fear that every complication, every adverse outcome, or every honest error could end their careers. Without that protection, the practice of medicine itself becomes unsafe — not for patients, but for practitioners. That’s why the system is layered: Civil courts decide compensation. Criminal courts handle reckless or gross negligence. Medical councils step in only when ethics are breached and misconduct is clear. This is how we try to be fair to both patients and practitioners.So,  rolling back to the critical question can medical councils punish negligence? In my opinion, Maybe— only when it amounts to misconduct. Gross, reckless, or ethically compromised acts must be punished but honest errors, adverse outcomes despite proper care, or treatment within accepted standards are not misconduct. By keeping this distinction clear, medical councils protect both patient welfare and the dignity of the medical profession. Because at the end of the day, our duty is not just to discipline. It is also to protect — to protect the patient from harm, and to protect the doctor from unfair blame. That is the only way trust can survive in healthcare.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are of the author and not of Medical Dialogues. The Editorial/Content team of Medical Dialogues has not contributed to the writing/editing/packaging of this article.

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News