Bangalore: Doctors challenge PC-PNDT Act provisions, High Court stays exam

th, 2016.

Medical Dialogues Team had reported earlier that ,On February 18^th, 2016, decision of the Delhi High court came out whereby the hon’ble court declared section Rule 3(3)(1)(b) of the PNDT Rules (as it stands after the amendment with effect from 9th January, 2014) as ultra vires to the extent it requires a person desirous of setting up a Genetic Clinic / Ultrasound Clinic / Imaging Centre to undergo six months training imparted in the manner prescribed in the Six Months Training Rules. It further stated that Section 2(p) of the PNDT Act defining a Sonologist or Imaging Specialist, is bad to the extent it includes persons possessing a postgraduate qualification in ultrasonography or imaging techniques – because there is no such qualification recognized by MCI and the PNDT Act does not empower the statutory bodies constituted there under or the Central Government to devise and coin new qualification.

Read Also : Delhi High Court Judgement clarifies who can do an ultrasound

The petition referring to the above judgement has asked for similar directions in state adding that the sole object of PC-PNDT act is prevention of modality for the purpose of sex determination and not defining who can do an ultrasound and who cannot.

DH reports that the petitioners have sought directions to quash the notice dated April 27, issued by the Directorate of Health and Family Welfare, calling all medical practitioners who are already registered for conducting ultrasonography in a genetic clinic or ultrasound clinic or imaging center to register for the competency-based evaluation