Promotion Criteria for medical faculty- MCI to rethink on Publication criteria??
Advertisement
Over the past year, there has been a constant debate in various journals on the circular issued by the Medical Council of India (MCI) in September 2015, regarding the requirements for promotion of teaching faculty.
The lack of a time-bound promotion system of medical faculty results in higher stress, dissatisfaction, lower productivity and quality of life and work. The critics have highlighted several issues in the assessment of publication for teacher's promotion, e.g the exclusion of publications in "electronic-only" journals, awarding points only to "original research" papers and first or second authors, listing of indexing databases for journals, categorizing journals as national or international. The relevance of a journal's impact factor as a measure for assessment of publication has also been appraised overall quality of research papers published by academics in India and China, however, leaves much to be desired.
The system of open access journals came into vogue a decade ago with the legitimate objective of making scientific research accessible to academics in poor countries. It was felt that subscription-based journals such as Nature or The Lancet were unaffordable to academics and researchers in poor countries. Fraud is not new even the well-placed people, indulgence in fake research and possess fake PhD's for a substantial fee sub-standard non-peer-reviewed manuscript polluting scientific literature with trash.
The lack of a time-bound promotion system of medical faculty results in higher stress, dissatisfaction, lower productivity and quality of life and work. The critics have highlighted several issues in the assessment of publication for teacher's promotion, e.g the exclusion of publications in "electronic-only" journals, awarding points only to "original research" papers and first or second authors, listing of indexing databases for journals, categorizing journals as national or international. The relevance of a journal's impact factor as a measure for assessment of publication has also been appraised overall quality of research papers published by academics in India and China, however, leaves much to be desired.
The system of open access journals came into vogue a decade ago with the legitimate objective of making scientific research accessible to academics in poor countries. It was felt that subscription-based journals such as Nature or The Lancet were unaffordable to academics and researchers in poor countries. Fraud is not new even the well-placed people, indulgence in fake research and possess fake PhD's for a substantial fee sub-standard non-peer-reviewed manuscript polluting scientific literature with trash.
Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.