Age not a limiting factor- CABG Surpasses PCI for ACS in Elders with Multimorbidity

Written By :  MD Bureau
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-04-27 05:30 GMT   |   Update On 2022-04-27 05:30 GMT
Advertisement

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of mortality and is a global health problem reaching epidemic proportions in both developed as well as developing countries.

A recent study suggests that elderly patients with multivessel or left main coronary artery disease along with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have better clinical outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) than with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The study findings were published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society on 16 Apr 2022.

Advertisement

The optimal coronary revascularization strategy to maximize the patient-centred outcome of days alive and out of hospital (DAOH), in multimorbid older (≥65-years) adults after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is incompletely understood. Therefore, Dr Ahmed Ijaz Shah and his team conducted a study comparing revascularization strategies (CABG Vs PCI) in elderly adults, particularly in those with age-related comorbidities.

In this study, the researchers analyzed data from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health plan database and identified 3,871 patients 65 years and older presenting with ACS between 2010 and 2018 who were subsequently treated with CABG (n = 1,575) or PCI (n = 2,296) for left main or multivessel CAD. They performed a thorough propensity score modelling technique to avoid selection bias and inverse probability of treatment weighting. They further used cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the association of revascularization type with outcomes. The major outcome assessed was absolute DAOH and the relative risk of achieving ≥90%DAOH during three-time intervals. They also assessed the all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, stroke, rehospitalization, repeat revascularization, and dialysis initiation.

Key findings of the study:

  • Upon analysis, the researchers found that CABG (compared to PCI) was associated with a greater absolute number of DAOH, significant after the first year (mean difference at 1-year: +5.8 days; 3-years: +56 days; 5-years: + 131 days).
  • They further noted that the relative risk of achieving ≥90% DAOH significantly favoured CABG after the first year (1-year:1.02; 3-years:1.06, 5-years:1.12), and was related to lower incidences of all-cause mortality, repeat revascularization, rehospitalization, incident dialysis, and nonfatal MI with CABG.

The authors concluded, "In older adults with multivessel or left main coronary artery disease who presented with ACS, CABG, after the first year, was associated with a greater absolute number of DAOH—a geriatric and patient-centred outcome, compared to PCI. "

They further added, "CABG patients also had a higher probability of achieving ≥90%DAOH—with lower all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, repeat revascularization, new dialysis, and rehospitalization rates. Future randomized trials should study the impact of optimal revascularization strategies on the quality of life of older adults with multimorbidity."

For further information:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17794


Tags:    
Article Source :  Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News