Combined Intravascular Imaging and Physiology Improves PCI Outcomes and Reduces Costs: Study

Written By :  Dr Riya Dave
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2026-02-04 04:30 GMT   |   Update On 2026-02-04 04:30 GMT
Advertisement

Analysis of US Medicare data from 2016 to 2023 shows a gradual increase in the dual use of intravascular imaging (IVI) and invasive physiology (IP) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), although overall adoption remains limited. This combined approach, as well as each modality used individually, was associated with fewer major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 2 years and lower long-term healthcare costs compared with angiography alone. The study was published in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions by Frank A. and colleagues.

Advertisement

The application of advanced procedural guidance during PCI has grown over the last decade, although the real-world experience with combined IVI and IP in the United States has not been fully defined. This is a retrospective observational study that utilized Medicare fee-for-service claims data from 2016 through 2023. Patients aged 65 years or older who underwent their first PCI during the study period were included in the outcomes analysis. Procedural approaches were defined as either angiography alone, IVI alone, IP alone, or both IVI and IP. Outcomes were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, whereas cost analyses were conducted using gamma regression models.

Over the period from 2016 to 2023, a total of 2,538,154 PCI procedures were conducted on 1,958,990 patients. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 1,587,532 patients were considered for the final outcome analysis. This is one of the largest real-world analyses of PCI guidance strategies in the Medicare population in the U.S.

Key findings

  • IVI was employed in about 15% of all PCI procedures, IP in 7%, and combined IVI and IP in 2.5%.

  • However, the use of these modalities has increased significantly over time.

  • In 2023, the use of IVI increased to almost 30% of all PCIs, and combined IVI and IP to 4.7%.

  • The major outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events at 2 years, a composite of myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and all-cause mortality.

  • The use of dual IVI and IP was significantly associated with reduced rates of MACE compared with angiography alone.

  • The adjusted hazard ratio for MACE with dual IVI and IP was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.85-0.89; P < 0.0001), representing a 13% relative risk reduction.

The combined use of intravascular imaging and invasive physiology during PCI has shown a modest increase in the United States and is associated with a significantly lower rate of major adverse cardiovascular events and lower long-term health care costs compared with the use of angiography alone. These findings support the use of comprehensive strategies for PCI guidance.

Reference:

Medina, F. A., Mosarla, R. C., Kim, J. M., Li, S., Song, Y., Yeh, R. W., & Secemsky, E. A. (2026). Adjunctive imaging and physiology during percutaneous coronary intervention: Trends, outcomes, and costs among medicare beneficiaries. JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions, 19(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2025.09.047



Tags:    
Article Source : JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News