CRT With His-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing significantly improves LVEF among HF patients

Written By :  Dr Riya Dave
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-09-25 05:00 GMT   |   Update On 2023-09-25 06:38 GMT

A recent pilot study known as HOT-CRT has shown that for patients with heart failure, a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who require cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), His-Purkinje conduction system pacing (HPCSP) is both safe and effective as published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology by Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman and colleagues. In fact, the study found that HPCSP can provide a...

Login or Register to read the full article

A recent pilot study known as HOT-CRT has shown that for patients with heart failure, a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who require cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), His-Purkinje conduction system pacing (HPCSP) is both safe and effective as published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology by Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman and colleagues. In fact, the study found that HPCSP can provide a more significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared to traditional biventricular pacing.

The HOT-CRT pilot study included 100 patients with HFrEF and an indication for CRT.

Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving HPCSP and those undergoing biventricular pacing.

The primary outcome measured was the change in LVEF over six months.

  • After six months, patients treated with HPCSP experienced a mean increase in LVEF of 12.4%, significantly higher than the 8.0% observed in the biventricular pacing group (P = 0.02).
  • HPCSP resulted in a higher success rate (96% vs. 82%) with similar fluoroscopy and procedure durations compared to biventricular pacing.
  • There was no significant difference in the primary safety outcome, freedom from major complications, between the two groups (98% vs. 96%).
  • Overall adverse events were less frequent in the HPCSP group (6% vs. 20%, P = 0.04).
  • The HOT-CRT pilot study suggests that HPCSP-guided CRT may offer greater improvements in LVEF compared to biventricular pacing, potentially translating into reduced heart failure hospitalizations or mortality.
  • The findings provide support for the concept of conduction system pacing as an effective approach for patients requiring CRT.
  • Larger randomized clinical trials, such as the ongoing Left vs. Left trial with approximately 2,100 patients, will further evaluate the benefits of HPCSP compared to traditional pacing methods.

While conduction system pacing shows promise, long-term studies are needed to assess lead placement and potential complications associated with this approach. In summary, the HOT-CRT pilot study sheds light on the potential advantages of His-Purkinje conduction system pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure patients. This study serves as a stepping stone towards confirming the benefits of HPCSP through larger clinical trials, offering hope for improved treatment options for individuals with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

Reference:

Vijayaraman P, Pokharel P, Subzposh FA, et al. His-Purkinje conduction system pacing optimized trial of cardiac resynchronization therapy (HOT-CRT) versus biventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol EP. 

Tags:    
Article Source : JACC Clinical Electrophysiology

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News