Dapagliflozin safely improves outcomes in people with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension: DELIVER Trial

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-10-16 06:00 GMT   |   Update On 2023-11-01 10:35 GMT
Advertisement

USA: In a post hoc analysis of the DELIVER trial dapagliflozin was shown to be well-tolerated and consistently improved clinical outcomes, including among those with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH). The findings were published online in the journal Circulation on 13 October 2023.

Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension is defined as BP ≥140/90 mm Hg (≥130/80 mm Hg if diabetes) despite treatment with 3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic.

Advertisement

Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension is prevalent and associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. In the DELIVER trial, aTRH was identified in >1 in 10 patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction >40%. In this high-risk population, not much is known about the potential role of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibition.

In the analysis of the DELIVER trial (Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure), John W. Ostrominski, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, and colleagues evaluated treatment effects and clinical profiles of dapagliflozin among participants with aTRH.

For the analysis, DELIVER participants were divided based on baseline blood pressure (BP). Nonresistant hypertension was defined as BP above the threshold but not meeting TRH criteria. Controlled BP was defined as BP under threshold.

Incidence of the primary outcome (worsening heart failure event or cardiovascular event), safety events, and key secondary outcomes were evaluated by baseline BP category.

The analysis led to the following findings:

  • Among 6263 DELIVER participants, 60.1% had controlled BP, 28.4% had nonresistant hypertension, and 11.5% had aTRH at baseline.
  • Participants with aTRH had more cardiometabolic comorbidities and tended to have higher left ventricular ejection fraction and worse kidney function.
  • Rates of the primary outcome were 8.7 per 100 patient-years in those with controlled BP, 8.5 per 100 patient-years in the nonresistant hypertension group, and 9.5 per 100 patient-years in the aTRH group. Relative treatment benefits of dapagliflozin versus placebo on the primary outcome were consistent across BP categories.
  • Participants with aTRH exhibited the greatest absolute reduction in the rate of primary events with dapagliflozin (4.1 per 100 patient-years) compared with nonresistant hypertension (2.7 per 100 patient-years) and controlled BP (0.8 per 100 patient-years).
  • Irrespective of assigned treatment, participants with aTRH experienced a higher rate of reported vascular events, including myocardial infarction and stroke, over study follow-up.
  • Dapagliflozin modestly reduced systolic BP (by ≈1 to 3 mm Hg) without increasing the risk of hypotension, hypovolemia, or other serious adverse events, irrespective of BP category, but did not improve the proportion of participants with aTRH attaining goal BP over time.

"Dapagliflozin consistently improved clinical outcomes and was well-tolerated, including among those with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension," the researchers concluded.

Reference:

Ostrominski, John W., et al. "Dapagliflozin and Apparent Treatment-Resistant Hypertension in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: the DELIVER Trial." Circulation, 2023.


Tags:    
Article Source : Circulation

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News