Do's and don'ts with direct oral anticoagulants

Written By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-02-23 23:15 GMT   |   Update On 2024-02-24 06:38 GMT
Advertisement

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a common treatment for patients with a wide variety of cardiovascular conditions. DOACs are the preferred treatment over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for many patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism, since the latter would have a higher risk of intracranial bleeding and more complex dosing routine. However, new research suggests that DOACs should not be the first line of treatment for every patient who need to treat or prevent blood clots. A systematic overview from researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, a founding member of Mass General Brigham, discusses the efficacy of DOACs compared to other treatment methods.

Advertisement

This review utilized data from randomized controlled trials to compare DOACs with other treatment methods for various cardiovascular conditions. Although there is merit to using DOACs in many common conditions, the manuscript provides a robust summary of clinical trials indicating that DOACs fare worse in patients with mechanical heart valves, thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome, atrial fibrillation associated with rheumatic heart disease, and patients with embolic stroke of unclear source. The authors also highlight clinical scenarios in which there is uncertainty, with a look toward future for better evidence generation.

“The results we reviewed here have significant implications for optimizing anticoagulation therapy and improving patient outcomes in clinical practice,” said Behnood Bikdeli, MD, MS, of the Brigham’s Heart and Vascular Center. “There is a critical need for further research regarding why DOACs are less efficacious or safe than the standard of care in certain scenarios.”

Reference:

Antoine Bejjani, Candrika D. Khairani, Ali Assi, Gregory Piazza, Parham Sadeghipour, Azita H. Talasaz, John Fanikos, Jean M. Connors, Deborah M. Siegal, Geoffrey D. Barnes, Karlyn A. Martin, Dominick J. Angiolillo, Dawn Kleindorfer, Manuel Monreal, David Jimenez, Saskia Middeldorp, Mitchell S.V. Elkind, Christian T. Ruff, Samuel Z. Goldhaber, Harlan M. Krumholz, Roxana Mehran, Mary Cushman, John W. Eikelboom, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Jeffrey I. Weitz, Renato D. Lopes, Behnood Bikdeli, When Direct Oral Anticoagulants Should Not Be Standard Treatment: JACC State-of-the-Art Review, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.038.


Tags:    
Article Source : Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News