Endovascular revascularization and exercise combo more effective in intermittent claudication

Written By :  Dr Satabdi Saha
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2021-07-27 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2021-07-27 03:31 GMT
Advertisement

A combination therapy of endovascular revascularization followed by supervised exercise is clinically and economically a more attractive approach than supervised exercise only for intermittent claudication up to 12-month follow-up, suggests results from a recently published study in Cardiology .

In spite of many previous studies ,the cost-effectiveness of the combination therapy as compared with supervised exercise is still not well defined. Using data from the Endovascular Revascularization and Supervised Exercise (ERASE) study, the cost-effectiveness was analysed.

Advertisement

The study population included two hundred twelve patients who were randomly assigned to the combination therapy (n=106) or supervised exercise only (n=106) and were followed for 12 months. Cumulative costs per patient were collected using the in-hospital resource utilization data and cost-questionnaires. Quality-adjusted life years were estimated using the EuroQol-5D questionnaire. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated from both the health care and societal perspective.

Results revealed some important facts.

  • As compared with supervised exercise only, the combination therapy cost an additional €1.462 (99% CI, 388 to 3862) from the health care perspective and €161 (99% CI, −2286 to 3106) from the societal perspective.
  • Accumulated quality-adjusted life- years during 1 year follow-up were 0.042 (99% CI, −0.009 to 0.118) higher in the combination therapy group.
  • The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €34.810 from the health care perspective and €3.833 from the societal perspective.
  • Compared with supervised exercise, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €80.000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the combination therapy had a probability of 87% and 95% of being cost-effective from the health care and societal perspective, respectively.

The research team concluded that combined therapy was an attractive strategy both clinically and economically up to 1 year. The long-term cost-effectiveness of combined therapy remains unknown.

For full article follow the link: Endovascular Revascularization Plus Supervised Exercise Versus Supervised Exercise Only for Intermittent Claudication: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2021 Jul 13

Source: Cardiology


Tags:    
Article Source : Cardiology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News