Endovascular revascularization and exercise combo more effective in intermittent claudication

Written By :  Dr Satabdi Saha
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2021-07-27 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2021-07-27 03:31 GMT

A combination therapy of endovascular revascularization followed by supervised exercise is clinically and economically a more attractive approach than supervised exercise only for intermittent claudication up to 12-month follow-up, suggests results from a recently published study in Cardiology . In spite of many previous studies ,the cost-effectiveness of the combination therapy...

Login or Register to read the full article

A combination therapy of endovascular revascularization followed by supervised exercise is clinically and economically a more attractive approach than supervised exercise only for intermittent claudication up to 12-month follow-up, suggests results from a recently published study in Cardiology .

In spite of many previous studies ,the cost-effectiveness of the combination therapy as compared with supervised exercise is still not well defined. Using data from the Endovascular Revascularization and Supervised Exercise (ERASE) study, the cost-effectiveness was analysed.

The study population included two hundred twelve patients who were randomly assigned to the combination therapy (n=106) or supervised exercise only (n=106) and were followed for 12 months. Cumulative costs per patient were collected using the in-hospital resource utilization data and cost-questionnaires. Quality-adjusted life years were estimated using the EuroQol-5D questionnaire. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated from both the health care and societal perspective.

Results revealed some important facts.

  • As compared with supervised exercise only, the combination therapy cost an additional €1.462 (99% CI, 388 to 3862) from the health care perspective and €161 (99% CI, −2286 to 3106) from the societal perspective.
  • Accumulated quality-adjusted life- years during 1 year follow-up were 0.042 (99% CI, −0.009 to 0.118) higher in the combination therapy group.
  • The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €34.810 from the health care perspective and €3.833 from the societal perspective.
  • Compared with supervised exercise, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €80.000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the combination therapy had a probability of 87% and 95% of being cost-effective from the health care and societal perspective, respectively.

The research team concluded that combined therapy was an attractive strategy both clinically and economically up to 1 year. The long-term cost-effectiveness of combined therapy remains unknown.

For full article follow the link: Endovascular Revascularization Plus Supervised Exercise Versus Supervised Exercise Only for Intermittent Claudication: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2021 Jul 13

Source: Cardiology


Tags:    
Article Source : Cardiology

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News