High-sensitivity cardiac troponin test may overestimate risk in pulmonary embolism: JAMA

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-11-24 04:45 GMT   |   Update On 2023-11-24 06:41 GMT
Advertisement

Spain: Replacing cardiac troponin I (cTnI) with high-sensitivity-cTnI (hs-cTnI) may lead to an increase in the number of patients with positive troponin results but is not likely to improve the prediction of complicated course, a recent study published in JAMA Cardiology has shown. 

In the cohort study of 834 patients with hemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism (PE), hs-cTnI, compared with cTnI, more frequently detected elevated values, but did not predict the 30-day risk of a complicated course. 

Advertisement

Novel data from an exploratory analysis of the PROTECT study suggests that thresholds of hs-cTnI for acute myocardial infarction diagnosis may not be applicable to patients with PE. The results indicate lower specificity of hs-cTnI than cTnI in identifying patients with PE at risk of a complicated course. 

High-sensitivity troponin tests can detect even milder cardiac troponin increases in plasma, beyond the threshold of conventional troponin tests. However, there is no clarity on whether detecting low-grade cardiac troponin elevation is tied to outcomes of patients with hemodynamically stable PE and helps with risk stratification.

To clarify the same, Behnood Bikdeli, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, and colleagues aimed to determine the association between hs-cTnI compared with conventional cTnI and PE risk designations according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2019 classification scheme and clinical outcomes in patients with hemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism.

For this purpose, the researchers performed a post hoc analysis of data from the PROTECT cohort study enrolling patients from 12 hospital emergency departments in Spain. In the analysis, they compared cTnI and hs-cTnI concerning ESC risk designation and the association between troponin values and a complicated course after PE diagnosis was evaluated.

In the analysis, 98.3% had hsTnI and cTnI values available and were included from 848 patients enrolled in PROTECT. Outcomes included a complicated course, defined as hemodynamic collapse, recurrent PE, or all-cause death, within 30 days after PE.

The study led to the following findings:

  • Of 834 patients (mean age, 67.5 years; 50.8% female), 16.7% had elevated cTnI and 31.7% elevated hs-TnI, respectively.
  • During follow-up, 62 patients had a complicated course.
  • Analyzing troponin elevation as a binary variable, elevated cTnI (odds ratio [OR], 2.84) but not hs-cTnI (OR, 1.12) was associated with increased odds of a complicated course.
  • Of 125 patients who had elevated hs-cTnI but normal cTnI, none developed a complicated course.
  • Using the 2019 ESC risk stratification scheme, hs-TnI classified fewer patients as low risk compared with cTnI.
  • Among 78 patients designated as ESC low risk when using cTnI but not with hsTnI, none (0) had a complicated course.

In the study of patients with hemodynamically stable PE, hs-cTnI identified modest increases in cardiac troponin levels. However, the results failed to provide additive clinical value compared with cTnI.

"These findings suggest that hs-cTnI use may result in overestimation of the risk in patients with stable PE," the researchers wrote.

"Future studies should investigate whether using high-sensitivity troponin assays, rather than sensitive assays, results in excess in the use of advanced therapies in routine practice," they concluded.

Reference:

Bikdeli B, Muriel A, Rodríguez C, et al. High-Sensitivity vs Conventional Troponin Cutoffs for Risk Stratification in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism. JAMA Cardiol. Published online November 22, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2023.4356


Tags:    
Article Source : JAMA Cardiology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News