Loop Diuretics in Heart Failure: Torsemide and furosemide equally effective regardless of HF type

Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-11-18 03:45 GMT   |   Update On 2023-11-18 09:40 GMT

A recent post hoc analysis of the TRANSFORM-HF trial explored the clinical profiles and outcomes of heart failure (HF) patients treated with torsemide versus furosemide, focusing on differences between de novo HF and worsening chronic HF (WHF). This study was published in JAMA Cardiology by Selim R. and colleagues.The study included 2,858 patients with documented ejection fraction, revealing...

Login or Register to read the full article

A recent post hoc analysis of the TRANSFORM-HF trial explored the clinical profiles and outcomes of heart failure (HF) patients treated with torsemide versus furosemide, focusing on differences between de novo HF and worsening chronic HF (WHF). This study was published in JAMA Cardiology by Selim R. and colleagues.

The study included 2,858 patients with documented ejection fraction, revealing that 838 patients had de novo HF, and 2,020 had WHF. Noteworthy distinctions were observed, with de novo HF patients being younger, having a higher glomerular filtration rate, lower natriuretic peptide levels, and receiving lower doses of loop diuretics compared to WHF patients.

De novo HF was associated with lower all-cause mortality at 12 months (9.1% vs. 25.4% in WHF).

Patients with de novo HF exhibited lower all-cause first rehospitalization rates and greater improvement in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score at 12 months.

Torsemide and furosemide showed no significant difference in mortality, hospitalization rates, or total hospitalizations at 12 months for both de novo HF and WHF.

The analysis concludes that patients with de novo HF experience better clinical and patient-reported outcomes compared to those with WHF. Additionally, the choice between torsemide and furosemide did not significantly impact clinical or patient-reported outcomes over the 12-month period, irrespective of HF type.

This study sheds light on the nuanced differences in HF presentations and emphasizes the need for tailored treatment approaches based on HF type. The findings underscore the comparable effectiveness of torsemide and furosemide in managing HF, providing clinicians with valuable insights into optimizing diuretic strategies for improved patient outcomes.

Reference:

Krim, S. R., Anand, S., Greene, S. J., Chen, A., Wojdyla, D., Vilaro, J., Haught, H., Herre, J. M., Eisenstein, E. L., Anstrom, K. J., Pitt, B., Velazquez, E. J., & Mentz, R. J. Torsemide vs furosemide among patients with new-onset vs worsening chronic Heart Failure: A substudy of the TRANSFORM-HF randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiology,2023. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2023.4776

 


Tags:    
Article Source : JAMA Cardiology

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News