One month of DAPT after PCI as good as standard therapy in those at high bleeding risk: MASTER DAPT trial

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-01-14 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2022-01-14 03:31 GMT
Advertisement

Delhi: One month of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after the implantation of a drug-eluting coronary stent is noninferior to the continuation of therapy for at least 2 additional months in patients at high bleeding risk, show findings from the MASTER DAPT trial. The occurrence of net adverse clinical events and major adverse cardiac or cerebral events was comparable in both groups of patients (abbreviated therapy and standard therapy). Also, abbreviated therapy resulted in a lower risk of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding.

Advertisement

The appropriate duration of DAPT in patients at high risk for bleeding after the implantation of a drug-eluting coronary stent remains unclear. To determine the same, Marco Valgimigli, and colleagues designed a clinical trial -- MASTER DAPT. The study findings are published in the New England Journal of Medicine. 

One month following the implantation of a biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting coronary stent, patients with high bleed risk were randomized to discontinue dual antiplatelet therapy immediately (abbreviated therapy) or to continue it for at least 2 additional months (standard therapy).

The three ranked primary outcomes were net adverse clinical events (a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major bleeding), major adverse cardiac or cerebral events (a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke), and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding; cumulative incidences were assessed at 335 days. The first two outcomes were assessed for noninferiority in the per-protocol population and the third outcome for superiority in the intention-to-treat population. 

The study yielded the following findings:

  • Among the 4434 patients in the per-protocol population, net adverse clinical events occurred in 7.5% of patients in the abbreviated therapy group and in 7.7% of patients in the standard therapy group (difference, −0.23 percentage points).
  • 6.1% of patients in the abbreviated therapy group and 5.9% in the standard therapy group had a major adverse cardiac or cerebral event (difference, 0.11 percentage points).
  • Among the 4579 patients in the intention-to-treat population, major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 6.5 of patients in the abbreviated-therapy group and in 9.4%in the standard-therapy group (difference, −2.82 percentage points).

"Our findings revealed that one month of dual antiplatelet therapy was noninferior to the continuation of therapy for at least 2 additional months," wrote the authors. "This was shown with regards to the occurrence of net adverse clinical events and major adverse cardiac or cerebral events; abbreviated therapy also resulted in a lower incidence of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding."

Reference:

The study titled, "Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after PCI in Patients at High Bleeding Risk," is published in the New England Journal of Medicine. 

DOI: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2108749

Tags:    
Article Source : New England Journal of Medicine

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News