PCSK9 inhibitors act through plaque stabilisation not by improving coronary physiology: PACMAN-AMI trial
Switzerland: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients treated with alirocumab had a significant regression in angiographic diameter stenosis (DS%). In contrast, no improvement was observed in coronary haemodynamics, says a recent study published in EuroIntervention.
The study showed that treatment with alirocumab, a PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type) inhibitor, for one year did not lead to a statistically significant difference in the number of patients with a quantitative flow ratio (QFR) increase versus placebo. After excluding vessels with the least flow limitation (i.e., QFR>0.95), the results indicate that alirocumab may exert a small but significant beneficial effect on coronary haemodynamics in more flow-limiting diseases.
Additionally, patients on alirocumab showed statistically significant regression of DS% by 1.0% versus a 1.7% increase with placebo.
Previous studies have shown that treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors on top of statins results in plaque regression and stabilisation. However, there is no information on the effects of PCSK9 inhibitors on coronary physiology and angiographic DS%.
Therefore, Sarah Bär, Bern University Hospital Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland, and colleagues conducted a substudy of randomised, controlled, double-blind PACMAN-AMI trial comparing alirocumab versus placebo on top of rosuvastatin. The team aimed to investigate the effects of alirocumab on coronary haemodynamics as assessed by DS% and QFR by 3D-QCA (three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography) in non-infarct-related arteries (non-IRA) among AMI patients.
For this purpose, the researchers assessed QFR and 3D-QCA at baseline and one year in any non-IRA ≥2.0 mm and 3D-QCA DS% >25%. The prespecified primary endpoint was the number of patients with a mean QFR increase at one year, and the secondary endpoint was the change in 3D-QCA DS%.
The study revealed the following findings:
- Of 300 enrolled patients, 265 had a serial follow-up, of which 193 underwent serial QFR/3D-QCA analysis in 282 non-IRA.
- At one year, QFR increased in 53.2% of patients with alirocumab versus 40.4% with placebo (Δ12.8%; odds ratio 1.7).
- DS% decreased by 1.03±7.28% with alirocumab and increased by 1.70±8.27% with placebo (Δ–2.50%).
The findings revealed that treating AMI patients with the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab on top of rosuvastatin for one year led to significant 1.0% regression of 3D-QCA DS% versus an increase of 1.7% with placebo. The researchers observed no difference in the change in coronary physiology between treatment groups. However, compared to placebo-treated patients with a baseline QFR ≤0.95 more frequently, alirocumab showed improved coronary haemodynamics.
"A significant 1.0% angiographic stenosis regression with alirocumab treatment did not translate into a significant improvement in coronary physiology as evaluated by QFR," the researchers wrote. "Thus, PCSK9 inhibitors may rather act through plaque stabilisation than through improvement of coronary haemodynamics."
Reference:
Bär S, Kavaliauskaite R, Otsuka T, Ueki Y, Häner JD, Siontis GCM, Stortecky S, Shibutani H, Temperli F, Kaiser C, Iglesias JF, Jan van Geuns R, Daemen J, Spirk D, Engstrøm T, Lang I, Windecker S, Koskinas KC, Losdat S, Räber L. Impact of alirocumab on plaque regression and haemodynamics of non-culprit arteries in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a prespecified substudy of the PACMAN-AMI trial. EuroIntervention. 2023 Jun 21:EIJ-D-23-00201. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00201. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37341586.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.