Risk of bleeding and death lower in catheter-directed thrombolysis compared to systemic thrombolysis

Written By :  Niveditha Subramani
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-06-28 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-06-28 14:30 GMT

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a growing threat as its the third leading cause of death from cardiovascular disease after myocardial infarction and stroke. Therapeutic options for intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) include anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT); however, the role of CDT remains controversial. Researchers compared the...

Login or Register to read the full article

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a growing threat as its the third leading cause of death from cardiovascular disease after myocardial infarction and stroke. Therapeutic options for intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) include anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT); however, the role of CDT remains controversial.

Researchers compared the efficacy and safety of CDT with other therapeutic options using network meta-analysis. Study published in Canadian Medical Association Council reported anticoagulation when compared with CDT was associated with a lower risk of death and a similar risk of intracerebral hemorrhage.

David Planer and team conducted searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library from inception to Oct. 18, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared therapeutic options for PE, including anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis and CDT among patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE. The efficacy outcome was in-hospital death. Safety outcomes included major bleeding, intracerebral hemorrhage and minor bleeding.

The key findings of the study are

• They included data from 44 studies, representing 20 006 patients. Compared with systemic thrombolysis.

• CDT was associated with a decreased risk of death (odd ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32–0.57), intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29–0.64), major bleeding (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.53–0.70) and blood transfusion (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28–0.77).

• However, no difference in minor bleeding was observed between the 2 therapeutic options (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.66–1.87).

• Compared with anticoagulation, CDT was also associated with decreased risk of death (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.25–0.52), with no increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.63–2.79) or major bleeding (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.88–1.75).

Researchers concluded that “With moderate certainty of evidence, the risk of death and major bleeding complications was lower with CDT than with systemic thrombolysis. Compared with anticoagulation, CDT was associated with a probable lower risk of death and a similar risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, with moderate certainty of evidence. Although these findings are largely based on observational data, CDT may be considered as a first-line therapy in patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE.”

Reference: David Planer, Stav Yanko, et al; Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis; CMAJ Jun 2023, 195 (24) E833-E843; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.220960.

Tags:    
Article Source : Canadian Medical Association Council

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News