Risk of sudden death, resuscitated cardiac arrest highest in first month following acute MI, reveals JAMA study

Written By :  Jacinthlyn Sylvia
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-08-27 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2024-08-27 03:30 GMT

A new study published in the Journal of American Medical Association suggests that the risk of sudden death or resuscitated cardiac arrest (RCA) following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) peaked in the first month and then quickly decreased.

The patients with pulmonary congestion and/or left ventricular dysfunction following an acute myocardial infarction were recruited for the Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction (VALIANT) and Prospective ARNi vs. ACE Inhibitor Trial to Determine Superiority in Reducing Heart Failure Events After MI (PARADISE-MI) studies. In order to compare the rates of sudden death and resuscitated cardiac arrest following AMI in the PARADISE-MI and VALIANT trials, James Curtain and colleagues undertook this study.

Advertisement

The PARADISE-MI experiment enrolled participants between December 2016 and March 2020, while the VALIANT trial enrolled participants between December 1998 and June 2001. In the VALIANT and PARADISE-MI trials, the median follow-up was 22 months, while it was 24.7 months in the former. The research included individuals with AMI who were further affected by left ventricular failure or pulmonary congestion.

Advertisement

In the VALIANT trial enrolled 14,703 patients overall, the cohort was further refined to a subgroup that mirrored the risk profile of patients in the PARADISE-MI trial which was characterized by at least one augmenting risk factor and no prior history of heart failure. This subgroup comprised of 9,617 patients and reported a 7.4% incidence of sudden death or RCA. In contrast, the PARADISE-MI trial included 5,661 patients and showed a substantially lower incidence of 2.6%.

The analysis highlighted a particularly vulnerable period immediately following AMI, with sudden death rates peaking within the first month. Specifically, the rate of sudden death was 19.3 per 100 person-years in the VALIANT trial when compared to 9.5 per 100 person-years in the PARADISE-MI trial. These rates subsequently declined, illustrating the critical need for intensive early intervention post-AMI.

The reduction in sudden death rates in the PARADISE-MI trial can be attributed to several factors associated with contemporary management practices. The patients in the PARADISE-MI cohort were more frequently treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for their initial AMI, a procedure that opens blocked coronary arteries and restores blood flow to the heart. Additionally, the use of β-blockers, statins, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists was more common in the PARADISE-MI cohort when compared to the VALIANT cohort. Overall, the risk of sudden death/RCA in patients with a decreased left ventricular ejection fraction and/or pulmonary congestion was shown to be 2 to 3 times lower in the individuals getting contemporary care when compared to their counterparts from two decades ago.

Reference:

Curtain, J. P., Pfeffer, M. A., Braunwald, E., Claggett, B. L., Granger, C. B., Køber, L., Lewis, E. F., Maggioni, A. P., Mann, D. L., Rouleau, J. L., Solomon, S. D., Steg, P. G., Finn, P. V., Fernandez, A., Jering, K. S., & McMurray, J. J. V. (2024). Rates of Sudden Death After Myocardial Infarction—Insights From the VALIANT and PARADISE-MI Trials. In JAMA Cardiology. American Medical Association (AMA). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2024.2356

Tags:    
Article Source : JAMA Cardiology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News