Routine invasive therapy does not reduce major ischemic events: ISCHEMIA Trial

Published On 2022-02-16 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2022-02-18 18:04 GMT

Ischemia is a serious concern as some part of the body, vital organs such as heart or brain, isn't getting enough blood. Approximately 1.5 million cases of ischemic myocardial infarction (MI) occur annually in the United States; the yearly incidence rate is approximately 600 cases per 100,000 people. The goal of myocardial ischemia treatment is to improve blood flow to the heart muscle....

Login or Register to read the full article

Ischemia is a serious concern as some part of the body, vital organs such as heart or brain, isn't getting enough blood. Approximately 1.5 million cases of ischemic myocardial infarction (MI) occur annually in the United States; the yearly incidence rate is approximately 600 cases per 100,000 people. The goal of myocardial ischemia treatment is to improve blood flow to the heart muscle. Depending on the severity of your condition, doctor may recommend medications, surgery or both.

The ISCHEMIA trial fails at proving that routine invasive therapy was associated with a reduction in major adverse ischemic events compared with optimal medical therapy among stable patients with moderate ischemia.

Trial is published in journal American College of Cardiology

The trial compared routine invasive therapy with optimal medical therapy among patients with stable ischemic heart disease and moderate to severe myocardial ischemia on noninvasive stress testing. Patients with stable ischemic heart disease and moderate to severe ischemia were randomized to routine invasive therapy included 2,588 participants versus medical therapy had 2,591.

In the routine invasive therapy group, subjects underwent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as appropriate. The primary outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure at 3.3 years occurred in 13.3% of the routine invasive group compared with 15.5% of the medical therapy group.

Over the entire follow-up period, cardiac catheterization was performed in 96%of the invasive group vs. 28% of the medical therapy group. Coronary revascularization was performed in 80% of the invasive group vs. 23% of the medical therapy group

Results concluded among patients with stable ischemic heart disease and moderate to severe ischemia on noninvasive stress testing, routine invasive therapy failed to reduce major adverse cardiac events compared with optimal medical therapy. There was possible enhanced benefit for invasive compared with heart failure/left ventricular dysfunction.

Reference: https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/clinical-trials/2019/11/15/17/27/ischemia

Tags:    
Article Source : American College of Cardiology

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News