Single tablet with 4 BP lowering drugs can be more effective than taking 3 drugs in separate pills: ESC 2024

Published On 2024-09-03 23:45 GMT   |   Update On 2024-09-03 23:46 GMT

A single-pill combination of four blood-pressure (BP)-lowering medications was significantly more effective than a combination of three medications, according to late-breaking research presented in a Hot Line session today at ESC Congress 2024.

Explaining why new treatment strategies are needed for hypertension, Principal Investigator, Professor Stefano Taddei from the University of Pisa, Italy, said: “Patients with resistant hypertension on three BP medications, namely a diuretic, a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor and a calcium channel blocker, require the addition of a fourth medication. However, adherence decreases with the number of pills prescribed. In the QUADRO trial, we investigated adding bisoprolol, as part of a single-pill combination of four different BP-lowering medications, and found this was more effective than receiving three BP-lowering medications.”

Advertisement

In the double-blind randomised controlled QUADRO trial, patients with resistant hypertension initially entered an 8-week run-in period where they received the triple combination of perindopril, indapamide and amlodipine at optimal doses (either 10/2.5/5 mg or 10/2.5/10 mg daily, if tolerated). Those who still had uncontrolled BP after 8 weeks (office systolic BP ≥140 mmHg and 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP ≥130 mmHg), while being adherent to the therapy, were randomised 1:1 to either continue the same triple therapy or to receive a single-pill combination containing perindopril, indapamide, amlodipine and bisoprolol (at either 10/2.5/5/5 mg or 10/2.5/10/5 mg daily) for 8 weeks. To preserve the blinding, patients in the two groups received the same number of pills every day: two capsules and one tablet. The primary endpoint was the change in office systolic BP. Secondary endpoints included 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, office diastolic BP, home BP and BP control.

In total, 183 patients were randomised from 49 centres in 13 countries. The mean age was 57 years and 47% were female. Mean office BP at baseline was 150.3 mmHg for systolic BP and 90.0 mmHg for diastolic BP.

After 8 weeks, mean office sitting systolic BP had reduced by 20.67 mmHg (standard deviation [SD] 15.37) in the quadruple single-pill group and reduced by 11.32 mmHg (SD 14.77) in the triple group. The adjusted difference between the groups was significant in favour of the quadruple single pill (−8.04 mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI] −11.99 to −4.09; p<0.0001).

A significant difference was also seen for the main secondary endpoint of mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP in the quadruple single-pill group vs. the triple group (−7.53 mmHg; 95% CI −10.95 to −4.11; p<0.0001). In addition, a significant difference was seen for mean office sitting diastolic BP in the quadruple single-pill group vs. the triple group (−6.14 mmHg; 95% CI −9.00 to −3.27; p<0.0001).

Overall, BP control (office sitting BP <140/90 mmHg) was achieved by 66.3% of patients on the quadruple single pill vs. 42.7% on triple therapy (p=0.001). Ambulatory BP normalisation (mean BP over 24 hour <130/80 mmHg) was 51.2% vs. 20.7% in favour of quadruple single pill (p<0.0001). Home BP normalisation (<135/85 mmHg) was achieved by 60.7% of patients on quadruple single-pill therapy vs. 25.4% on triple therapy (p<0.0001).

There were no major differences between the two groups in terms of adverse events, and no serious adverse events were reported.

“We were able to demonstrate the superiority of the quadruple single-pill combination, whichever BP measurement method was used. The availability of a quadruple single-pill combination that includes bisoprolol could help with non-adherence and provide much-needed effective BP control in patients with resistant or difficult-to-treat hypertension,” concluded Professor Taddei. 

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News