Stormy "COASTS": Aortic coarctoplasty may have long-term consequences, shows follow up study.
Presenting a long term follow up data from COAST and COAST II trials, Holzer et al have shown that coarctation stenting is effective at maintaining obstruction relief up to 60 months postimplant with reduction in the number of patients requiring antihypertensive medication. However, an increase in-stent fractures and reinterventions were observed between medium and long-term follow-up. The results were published today in Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions Journal.
Aortic coarctation should be considered as a life-long disease process. Current US guidelines recommend surgical repair or catheter-based stenting for adults with hypertension and significant native or recurrent aortic coarctation (class I, level of evidence B-NR), while balloon angioplasty can be considered in these patients if stenting isn't feasible and surgery isn't an option (class IB, level of evidence B-NR). Medical therapy also is recommended for treatment of the hypertension.
COAST and COAST II trials assessed the safety and efficacy of the balloon-expandable Cheatham-Platinum (CP) stent (NuMED). The device, available in both bare-metal and covered versions, was specifically designed to address aortic coarctation. Long-term outcome data of stent-implantation for coarctation of the aorta are limited. Authors now report the 5 year follow-up results from these studies.
Data was prospectively collected during the 2 multi-center studies, enrolling 248 patients (COAST: n=121, COAST II: n=127). Late follow-up data (48–60 month) was compared with immediate (1 month) and early (12 months) follow-up.
Covered stents had been implanted in 52% and bare stents in 48%, with a median minimum stent diameter of 14.4 mm. The minimum ratio of stent diameter to aorta at the diaphragm was 0.87.
The results were as follows:
1. There was a notable decrease in the use of antihypertensive medication, from 53% at immediate, to 42% at early, and 29% at late follow-up but there was no increase in the proportion of patients who had elevated systolic BP.
2. Stent fractures were noted in 24% patients at 5 years.
3. 21% patients required catheter reintervention at 60 months.
Stent fractures at 48/60 months were independently predicted by age < 18 years, male sex, minimum stent diameter ≥ 12 mm, and bare-metal stent use. For reintervention, predictors also included age < 18 years and stent diameter ≥ 12 mm, joined by postimplantation systolic arm-leg BP gradient ≥ 10 mm Hg and initial coarctation minimum diameter < 6 mm.
Additionally, by late follow-up, 13 patients had signs of aortic wall injury (aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm), for a cumulative incidence of 6.3%, up from 1.2% at 12 months.
Compared with bare-metal stents, "covered stents appear to confer some protection from the development of stent fractures but do not provide complete protection from late aneurysm formation," the authors noted.
"We need to be constantly vigilant at identifying potential problems related to the initial coarctation and subsequent therapy, because they do occur. You cannot just discharge the patient—something that looks great now may not look great in 10 years' time", added Holzer.
• Source: Circulation cardiovascular interventions: Holzer RJ, Gauvreau K, McEnaney K, et al. Long-term outcomes of the Coarctation of the Aorta Stent Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:e010308.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.