Structural valve deterioration tied to worse outcomes; favorable for TAVI versus surgery patients: JAMA
Five-year structural valve deterioration is associated with worse clinical outcomes, favoured patients with a self-expanding TAVR placed instead of surgery.
USA: In patients undergoing self-expanding TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) versus surgery, a recent JAMA Cardiology study showed a lower structural valve deterioration rate (SVD) rate at five years. Also, doppler echocardiography was shown to be a helpful tool for SVD detection, which was linked with worse clinical outcomes.
Considering the poor understanding of the frequency and clinical importance of structural valve deterioration in patients undergoing self-expanding TAVI or surgery, the researchers aimed to investigate the 5-year incidence, clinical outcomes, and predictors of hemodynamic SVD in this population.
Daniel O'Hair, Cardiovascular Service Line, Boulder Community Health, Boulder, Colorado and colleagues addressed the question, what are the 5-year outcomes, incidence and predictors of SVD following supra-annular, self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve implantation, or surgery from large-scale randomized clinical trials?
The researchers pooled data from the SURTAVI (n = 1484) and CoreValve US High-Risk Pivotal (n = 615) randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for the post hoc analysis. The data pooling was supplemented by the CoreValve Continued Access Study (n = 2178) and CoreValve Extreme Risk Pivotal trial (n = 485). The study included patients with severe aortic valve stenosis considered at intermediate or increased risk of 30-day surgical mortality. Data analysis was done from December 2021 to October 2022, and the collection was from December 2010 to June 2016.
Patients were randomized to surgery or self-expanding TAVI in the RCTs or underwent TAVI for clinical indications in nonrandomized studies.
SVD incidence through 5 years was assessed from the RCTs (primary endpoint). Factors linked with CVD and its association with clinical outcomes were investigated for the pooled RCT and non-RCT populations. SVD was described as (1) an increase in the mean gradient of 10 mm Hg or higher from discharge or at 30 days to the last echocardiography with a final mean gradient of 20 mm Hg or higher or (2) new-onset modest or severe intraprosthetic aortic regurgitation or a rise of 1 grade or more.
The authors reported the following findings:
- Of 4762 included patients, 54.7% were male, and the mean age was 82.1 years.
- The study included a total of 2099 RCT patients, comprising those who received TAVI (n=1128) and who received surgery (n=971) and non-RCT patients who received TAVI (n=2663).
- The cumulative incidence of SVD treating the death as a competing risk was lesser in patients undergoing TAVI versus surgery (TAVI, 2.20%; surgery, 4.38%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.46). This lower risk was most prominent in smaller annuli patients (23 mm diameter or smaller; TAVI, 1.32%; surgery, 5.84%; HR, 0.21).
- SVD was linked with increased 5-year all-cause mortality (HR, 2.03), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.86), and valve disease or worsening heart failure hospitalizations (HR, 2.17).
- SVD predictors were developed from multivariate analysis.
To conclude, structural valve deterioration is associated with worse outcomes, and self-expanding TAVI is associated with a lower rate of SVD compared to surgery.
Reference:
O'Hair D, Yakubov SJ, Grubb KJ, et al. Structural Valve Deterioration After Self-Expanding Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients at Intermediate or High Risk. JAMA Cardiol. Published online December 14, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2022.4627
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.