Study shows poor adherence to guidelines for management of CIEDs infections: JAMA

Written By :  dr. Abhimanyu Uppal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-11-13 16:00 GMT   |   Update On 2023-11-14 04:43 GMT
Advertisement

Complete hardware removal is a class I recommendation for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, but practice patterns and outcomes remain unknown. A recent study published in JAMA Cardiology suggests that only less than one-fifth of patients with CIED infection undergo this extraction and that there is a need to improve guideline-directed care of patients with CIED infections.

Advertisement

Infection remains a serious complication associated with CIEDs. Lead removal in cardiac implantable electronic device infections has been consistently reported with high success, low complication and very low mortality rates. Multiple guidelines have stated that complete and early extraction is associated with significantly better clinical outcomes compared with no extraction. Despite this rates of guideline- recommended lead extraction among CIED infection remains low/ poor recommendation compliance is seen.

To address this gap in literature a recent study was published in JAMA cardiology by Pokorney et al. They analysed data from a cohort of patients with de novo CIED implantation over a period of 14 years.

A CIED infection was defined as 1) endocarditis or infection of a device implant with 2) documented antibiotic therapy. The objective was to quantify the number of Medicare patients with CIED infections who underwent lead extraction to analyse the outcomes in these patients in a nationwide clinical practice cohort. The primary outcomes of interest were device infection, device extraction and all-cause mortality.

A total of 1065549 patients were followed. A total of 1.1% patients had device related infection. Infection occurred within a mean of 2.4 years after implantation and 1 year survival rate was 68.3%. A total of 18.6% with CIED infections underwent extraction within 30 days of diagnosis, while 13.4% had extraction within 6 days of diagnosis and 5.2% had extraction between days 7 and 30.

There was evidence of highly selective treatment as most patients did not have extraction within 30 days of diagnosis. Any extraction was associated with lower mortality rates compared with no extraction and further, extraction within 6 days was associated with even lower risk of mortality.

To conclude, infection is a life-threatening complication of implanted CIED’s. Although clinical evidence and guidelines support extraction of infected CIED, adherence remains limited. Findings suggest a need to improve compliance to guideline-directed care among patients with CIED infections.

Source: JAMA Cardiology: doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2023.3379

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News