Target O2 saturation of 90-94% fails to improve survival in out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest resuscitation
The EXACT randomized trial found that patients having an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and achieving the return of spontaneous circulation with an oxygen saturation of 90% to 94% did not have an improved survival rate when compared with 98% to 100% oxygen saturation until admission to the intensive care unit. The trial results were published in the journal JAMA Network.
In out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the administration of a high oxygen concentration following spontaneous circulation recovery may increase reperfusion brain injury. Researchers conducted a trial to determine whether targeting a lower oxygen saturation in the early phase of post-resuscitation care for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest improves survival at hospital discharge.
Between December 11, 2017, and August 11, 2020, a multicenter, parallel-group randomized clinical trial was done on unconscious adults with the return of spontaneous circulation and peripheral oxygen saturation (Spo2) of at least 95% while receiving 100% oxygen at 2 emergency medical services and 15 hospitals in Victoria and South Australia, Australia. Data was collected from ambulance and hospital medical records. 428 patients enrolled in the trial were randomized by paramedics to two groups of Intervention group with 216 patients and a standard care group with 212 patients. They received oxygen titration to achieve an oxygen saturation of either 90% to 94% in the intervention group or 98% to 100% in the standard care group until arrival in the intensive care unit. The primary outcome was survival until discharge from the hospital. Hypoxic episodes (Spo2 90%) and prespecified serious adverse events, such as hypoxia with rearrest, were among the nine secondary outcomes gathered.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.