Trigger-specific syncope in Long QT syndrome tied to differential risk of life-threatening events: JAMA
USA: A recent study published in JAMA Cardiology has shed light on the association between syncope trigger type and risk of subsequent life-threatening events in patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS).
The cohort study involving 2983 patients revealed that syncopal episodes associated with adrenergic triggers were linked with the highest risk of subsequent life-threatening events (LTE) in patients with LQT type 1, followed by patients with type 2, and the researchers found no risk among those with type 3. For syncopal episodes associated with nonadrenergic triggers, only patients with LQT type 2 were at an increased risk of subsequent LTE.
The findings suggest that trigger-specific syncope in LQTS patients was tied to differential risk of subsequent life-threatening events.
Syncope is reported to be the most powerful predictor for subsequent life-threatening events in congenital LQTS patients. There is no information on whether distinct syncope triggers are associated with differential subsequent risk of LTEs. To fill this knowledge gap, Arwa Younis, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, and colleagues aimed to evaluate the association between adrenergic (AD)– and nonadrenergic (non–AD)-triggered syncopal events and the subsequent LTEs risk in patients with LQT types 1 to 3 (LQT1-3) in a retrospective cohort study.
The study contained data from 5 international LQTS registries. The study comprised 2938 patients with genetically confirmed LQT1, LQT2, or LQT3 stemming from a single LQTS-causative variant (mean age at enrollment, 29 years; 56% were females).; and enrollment was done from 1979 to 2021. In patients with β-blockers, a separate analysis was performed.
The study led to the following findings:
- In 1331 patients with LQT1, a first syncope occurred in 365 (27%) and was induced mostly with AD triggers (243 [67%]).
- Syncope preceded 43 subsequent LTEs (68%).
- Syncopal episodes associated with AD triggers were associated with the highest risk of subsequent LTE (hazard ratio [HR], 7.61), whereas the risk associated with syncopal events due to non-AD triggers was statistically nonsignificant (HR, 1.50).
- In 1106 patients with LQT2, a first syncope occurred in 26% of patients and was associated with AD and non-AD triggers in 37% and 63%, respectively.
- Syncope preceded 55 LTEs (56%). Both AD- and non–AD-triggered syncope were associated with a greater than 3-fold increased risk of subsequent LTE (HR, 3.07 and HR, 3.45).
- In 501 patients with LQT3, LTE was preceded by a syncopal episode in 12% patients.
- In patients with LQT1 and LQT2, treatment with β-blockers following a syncopal event was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of subsequent LTEs.
- The rate of breakthrough events during treatment with β-blockers was significantly higher among those treated with selective agents vs nonselective agents.
"The study findings suggest an association between syncope episode triggers and subsequent LTEs risk and response to therapy by genotype," the researchers wrote. "These data may be useful for improved genotype-specific risk stratification and management in LQTS."
Reference:
Younis A, Bos JM, Zareba W, et al. Association Between Syncope Trigger Type and Risk of Subsequent Life-Threatening Events in Patients With Long QT Syndrome. JAMA Cardiol. Published online July 12, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1951
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.