Universal Troponin Screening May Not Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in Cancer Patients Receiving ICIs: JAMA

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2026-08-01 03:45 GMT   |   Update On 2026-08-01 07:24 GMT
Advertisement

France: A cohort study in older patients with metastatic solid cancers found that systematic troponin monitoring was not associated with a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) among those receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), even after competing-risk analysis and propensity-score matching.

The findings suggest that universal troponin screening offers limited benefit for unselected patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Instead, surveillance for cardiovascular immune-related toxicity may be better guided by baseline risk for ICI-associated cardiotoxicity and clinical symptoms rather than troponin levels alone. Further studies are needed to determine whether risk-adapted screening can improve outcomes while minimizing unnecessary treatment interruptions.
Advertisement
The study, published as an Original Investigation in JAMA Network Open by Imen Hamdi, Department of Cardiology, Institut Montsouris, Paris, France, and colleagues, evaluated whether routine troponin monitoring could reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events or death among patients with advanced solid tumors receiving ICIs.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed cancer treatment but can occasionally trigger immune-related cardiovascular complications, including myocarditis. While current recommendations support troponin testing for the early detection of ICI-associated myocarditis, its value as a universal screening strategy for all patients remains uncertain.
To evaluate this, researchers conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 859 adults treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors between 2017 and 2022. Patients who underwent routine troponin monitoring during the first three months of therapy were compared with those receiving standard care without scheduled screening. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events, including ICI-associated myocarditis, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure hospitalization, sudden cardiac death, and cardiovascular death.
Key Findings:
  • The study included 859 patients with a mean age of 70.1 years, of whom 60.2% were men, and 68.1% had lung cancer.
  • Over a median follow-up of 3.3 months, 40 patients (4.7%) experienced a MACE, including six cases (0.7%) of ICI-associated myocarditis.
  • A total of 484 patients (56.3%) died during follow-up, with more than 90% of deaths attributed to cancer progression.
  • Multivariable analysis initially linked routine troponin screening with a lower combined risk of mortality and major cardiovascular events.
  • However, this association was no longer significant after competing-risk analysis accounting for cancer-related deaths and after propensity score matching.
  • Overall, systematic troponin monitoring did not significantly reduce adjudicated major cardiovascular events in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.
The researchers noted limitations including the retrospective design, potential residual confounding, the low incidence of myocarditis, lack of routine cardiac MRI to detect subclinical disease, and non-standardized troponin assays across centers. They added that the findings may not be generalizable to patients at lower cardiovascular risk or those at high risk of ICI-associated myocarditis.
Overall, the findings suggest that routine troponin screening offers limited benefit in unselected patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. The researchers recommend reserving troponin testing for patients with suspected cardiovascular toxicity or a high risk of ICI-associated myocarditis and call for prospective studies to assess risk-adapted screening strategies.
Reference:
Hamdi I, El Bèze N, Henriquez S, et al. Troponin Screening and Major Cardiovascular Adverse Events During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy. JAMA Netw Open. 2026;9(7):e2624168. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.24168


Tags:    
Article Source : JAMA Network Open

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News