Vitamin D may not improve biomarkers of insulin resistance, and inflammation; says AHA

Written By :  Dr Satabdi Saha
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2021-06-18 15:45 GMT   |   Update On 2021-06-18 15:42 GMT

Researchers have conducted a DAYLIGHT randomized controlled trial and found that high‐dose vitamin D supplementation did not improve biomarkers of glycemia, inflammation, neurohormonal activation, or lipids. The study results have been published in Journal of the American Heart Association. Experimental and observational studies have suggested a link between vitamin...

Login or Register to read the full article

Researchers have conducted a  DAYLIGHT randomized controlled trial and found that high‐dose vitamin D supplementation did not improve biomarkers of glycemia, inflammation, neurohormonal activation, or lipids. The study results have been published in Journal of the American Heart Association.

Experimental and observational studies have suggested a link between vitamin D and cardiovascular and metabolic disease, but this has not been confirmed in randomized controlled trials. Researchers sought to determine whether vitamin D supplementation reduces biomarkers of insulin resistance, inflammation, neurohormonal activation, and lipids.

This was a prespecified, secondary analysis of the DAYLIGHT (Vitamin D Therapy in Individuals at High Risk of Hypertension) randomized controlled trial. They measured circulating homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, hs‐CRP (high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein), N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide, renin, aldosterone, and lipids at baseline and at 6 months in 289 individuals with low vitamin D status (25‐hydroxyvitamin‐D [25‐OH‐D] ≤25 ng/mL) receiving low‐dose (400 IU/d) versus high‐dose (4000 IU/d) vitamin D3 for 6 months. A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials reporting biomarker changes after vitamin D supplementation was then performed.

Results put forth some facts.

  • Levels of 25‐OH‐D increased in the high‐dose relative to the low‐dose vitamin D group (+15.5 versus +4.6 ng/mL, P<0.001).
  • Changes in biomarkers of glycemia, inflammation, and neurohormonal activation did not differ by dose.
  • Lipids did not differ between groups, other than triglycerides, which increased in the high‐dose compared with the low‐dose group (+11.3 versus −6.2 mg/dL, P<0.001).
  • The meta‐analysis showed potential modest decreases in homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance and hs‐CRP, but no changes in low‐density lipoprotein, after vitamin D supplementation compared with control groups.

"In this secondary analysis of the DAYLIGHT (Vitamin D Therapy in Individuals at High Risk of Hypertension) randomized controlled trial, individuals randomized to high‐dose vitamin D supplementation did not experience improvements in biomarkers of insulin resistance, inflammation, neurohormonal activation, or lipids.High‐dose vitamin D supplementation does not improve biomarkers of glycemia, inflammation, neurohormonal activation, or lipids in otherwise healthy individuals with low vitamin D status."the research team concluded.

For full article follow the link: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017727

Source: Journal of the American Heart Association





Tags:    
Article Source : Journal of the American Heart Association

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News