conducting a hip surgery wrongly by using bad quality plates, delaying treatment and also carrying on the procedure without having full knowledge of it. The patient as a result of this is suffering from permanent disability. Other allegations include not having sufficient infrastructure at the hospital, hence referring the patient to another hospital for CT Scan
Dr Nagappa in his defence informed the forum that the patient was kept under observation for two days before the surgery was performed on the third day. The universal method of treatment was adopted, he said, adding that bone grafting was also done. He also stated that a complete hip replacement surgery would not have been possible immediately reports IndiaTV
The doctor also informed that he recommended the patient to consult Dr Madan Mohan Reddy who suggested that the patient should undergo a total hip replacement. However, Nagappan did not give the any reason Tyagaraj why he was asking him to move to another hospital.
On the matter of the inferior plates, Nagappa claimed that he had advised the patient not to walk or put any pressure on his hip but the patient had not heeded his advice or come back for check-ups, but the forum went through a summary of the surgery provided by the hospital to the patient and found that no such suggestions were made.
However, the court rejected the doctors submissions, and remarked that Dr Nagappan consulted a doctor from another hospital, and referred the patient without assigning any reason in the discharge summary for not performing hip replacement. Also, there is nothing on record to show that post-operative care advice was given to the patient who suffered due to a bent metal plate, which needed corrective surgery. "The wait for a period of two to three days to undertake surgery is a clear case of delay," they concluded.
"Dr Nagappan has no knowledge of treatment of hip replacement and Bharathi Rajaa hospital does not have sufficient infrastructure for conducting such a surgery," TOI quotes the court as stating.
The forum has now asked directed the hospital to pay Rs 1 lakh as compensation to the complainant, topping it with Rs 6.18 lakh towards medical expenses, another one lakh towards loss of income and Rs 20,000 as litigation fees. If the hospital fails to pay the amount, then they would have to pay the money with 9 per cent interest, according to reports.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.