Intranasal Epinephrine Spray Outperforms Autoinjectors for treatment of anaphylaxis

Written By :  Aditi
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-12-24 12:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-12-25 06:29 GMT

The recent updates to the acute anaphylaxis guideline have highlighted the need for improved therapeutic options to address existing gaps in care as a top priority.According to a study published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Global, researchers have concluded that NDS1C offers a needle-free, user-friendly solution for self-administering epinephrine. This is better than...

Login or Register to read the full article

The recent updates to the acute anaphylaxis guideline have highlighted the need for improved therapeutic options to address existing gaps in care as a top priority.

According to a study published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Global, researchers have concluded that NDS1C offers a needle-free, user-friendly solution for self-administering epinephrine. This is better than the 0.3 mg autoinjector to address unmet medical and patient needs.

This study compares the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, safety, and tolerability profiles of intranasal and intramuscular epinephrine. One hundred sixteen healthy adults received 13.2 mg intranasal epinephrine, 0.3 mg autoinjector, or 0.5 mg manual syringe intramuscular epinephrine. Participants with 50, 100, and 200 pg/mL epinephrine concentrations were evaluated at 10-, 20-, 30-, and 60 minutes post-dose.

The results of this study could be summarised as follows:

· PK parameters for the 13.2 mg IN dose exceeded those of the 0.3 mg autoinjector with a rapid and higher Cmax and greater systemic exposure.

· The maximum concentration of epinephrine for intranasal spray was 429.4 pg/mL, and for autoinjector was 328.6 pg/mL

· PK parameters for opposite and same nostril dosing were higher than both intramuscular doses except Tmax, which was between the two intramuscular doses (20 min for intranasal, 14.9 min for autoinjector, and 45 min for manual syringe).

· Of the 54 participants, 27 achieved the same epinephrine levels as the autoinjector after opposite-nostril administration in approximately 8.2 minutes, while 33 of the 49 participants with same-nostril administration reached the same levels in 6.2 minutes.

· No severe or unexpected adverse events were reported, confirming the safety and tolerability of intranasal epinephrine.

NDS1C, a nasal spray developed by Bryn Pharmaceutics, delivers epinephrine without requiring a needle. Its compact size makes it easily portable and can be used without specialized medical training. This product aims to provide the allergy community a treatment option similar to the EpiPen autoinjector, currently the preferred treatment for outpatients.

Reference:

Dworaczyk, et al. 13.2 mg Intranasal Epinephrine Spray Demonstrates Comparable Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety to 0.3 mg Epinephrine Autoinjector. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Global, 100200.

Tags:    
Article Source : The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Global

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News