No significant differences in mortality or adverse effects between methimazole and propylthiouracil for managing thyroid storm

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-05-04 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-05-04 14:30 GMT

In this multi-centre cohort study, there were no significant differences in mortality or adverse effects between methimazole and propylthiouracil in the management of thyroid storm.Thyroid storm is the most severe form of thyrotoxicosis, with high mortality, and is treated with propylthiouracil and methimazole. Some guidelines recommend propylthiouracil over methimazole, although the...

Login or Register to read the full article

In this multi-centre cohort study, there were no significant differences in mortality or adverse effects between methimazole and propylthiouracil in the management of thyroid storm.

Thyroid storm is the most severe form of thyrotoxicosis, with high mortality, and is treated with propylthiouracil and methimazole. Some guidelines recommend propylthiouracil over methimazole, although the difference in outcomes associated with each treatment is unclear.

A study was done to compare outcomes associated with use of propylthiouracil vs methimazole for the treatment of thyroid storm.

This comparative effectiveness study comprised a large, multicenter, US-based cohort from the Premier Healthcare Database between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020. It included 1383 adult patients admitted to intensive or intermediate care units with a diagnosis of thyroid storm per International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes and treated with either propylthiouracil or methimazole. Analyses were conducted from July 2022 to February 2023.

Patients received either propylthiouracil or methimazole for treatment of thyroid storm. Exposure was assigned based on the initial thionamide administered. The primary outcome was the adjusted risk difference of in-hospital death or discharge to hospice between patients treated with propylthiouracil and those treated with methimazole, assessed by targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

Results

A total of 1383 patients were included in the study.

The standardized mean difference for age was 0.056, and the standardized mean difference for sex was 0.013.

The primary composite outcome occurred in 7.4% of of patients

A total of 8.5% of patients who initiated propylthiouracil and 6.3% who initiated methimazole died in the hospital (adjusted risk difference, 0.6%

There were no significant differences in duration of organ support, total hospitalization costs, or rates of adverse events between the 2 treatment groups.

In this comparative effectiveness study of a multicenter cohort of adult patients with thyroid storm, no significant differences were found in mortality or adverse events in patients who were treated with propylthiouracil or methimazole. Thus, current guidelines recommending propylthiouracil over methimazole for treatment of thyroid storm may merit reevaluation.

Reference:

Lee SY, Modzelewski KL, Law AC, Walkey AJ, Pearce EN, Bosch NA. Comparison of Propylthiouracil vs Methimazole for Thyroid Storm in Critically Ill Patients. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(4):e238655. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8655

Tags:    
Article Source : JAMA Network open

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News