Delhi HC no to terminating 25-week-old pregnancy of minor
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court refused to give its nod for termination of the 25-week-old pregnancy of a 15-year-old girl, after the medical board opined there was danger to the lives of both the foetus and the mother.A bench of justices S Muralidhar and I S Mehta said they cannot favour the minor girls wish to medically terminate her pregnancy, as the foetus is "viable".The court declined...
Login or Register to read the full article
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court refused to give its nod for termination of the 25-week-old pregnancy of a 15-year-old girl, after the medical board opined there was danger to the lives of both the foetus and the mother.
A bench of justices S Muralidhar and I S Mehta said they cannot favour the minor girls wish to medically terminate her pregnancy, as the foetus is "viable".
The court declined the termination after a medical board of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) submitted before the bench that the foetus has taken a shape and it would not be advisable to allow termination.
The medical board had informed the court that there is life-risk for both the mother and the foetus. Taking note of the boards submissions, the bench said it cannot approve the request of the girl.
It also disposed of the girls plea.
The bench on December 20 had ordered constitution of an appropriate medical board to examine the girl and the foetus and submit an evaluation report after it found that the minor had changed her stand on the matter several times.
The police had on November 27 taken into custody the man to whom the girl was "married". He was booked under the provisions of the Protection Of Children from Sexual Offences Act and the IPC.
Initially, the girl, who had left her house and "married" the man, did not wish to return to her parents and was sent to Prayas Juvenile Aid Centre. Later she returned to her parents.
The girl appeared before the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) on December 8 and stated that she wished to terminate her pregnancy, after which an AIIMS doctor was directed to examine her to ascertain if terminating her pregnancy was safe and medically advisable.
The doctor, however, noted that the girl was not willing to abort her pregnancy as she had "married" consensually.
He noted that her pregnancy was a result of rape, as she was less than 18-year-old and also said that termination of her pregnancy was not advisable.
The bench noted that the girl, through her father, has now approached the court stating that she wishes to terminate her foetus.
Section 3(2)(b) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act prohibits abortion of a foetus after 20 weeks of pregnancy.
Advocate Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, appearing for the girl, had urged that, as has been done in many similar cases by the Supreme Court, a medical board should be constituted to evaluate her status and submit a report if it is safe for her to undergo an abortion at this stage.
A bench of justices S Muralidhar and I S Mehta said they cannot favour the minor girls wish to medically terminate her pregnancy, as the foetus is "viable".
The court declined the termination after a medical board of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) submitted before the bench that the foetus has taken a shape and it would not be advisable to allow termination.
The medical board had informed the court that there is life-risk for both the mother and the foetus. Taking note of the boards submissions, the bench said it cannot approve the request of the girl.
It also disposed of the girls plea.
The bench on December 20 had ordered constitution of an appropriate medical board to examine the girl and the foetus and submit an evaluation report after it found that the minor had changed her stand on the matter several times.
The police had on November 27 taken into custody the man to whom the girl was "married". He was booked under the provisions of the Protection Of Children from Sexual Offences Act and the IPC.
Initially, the girl, who had left her house and "married" the man, did not wish to return to her parents and was sent to Prayas Juvenile Aid Centre. Later she returned to her parents.
The girl appeared before the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) on December 8 and stated that she wished to terminate her pregnancy, after which an AIIMS doctor was directed to examine her to ascertain if terminating her pregnancy was safe and medically advisable.
The doctor, however, noted that the girl was not willing to abort her pregnancy as she had "married" consensually.
He noted that her pregnancy was a result of rape, as she was less than 18-year-old and also said that termination of her pregnancy was not advisable.
The bench noted that the girl, through her father, has now approached the court stating that she wishes to terminate her foetus.
Section 3(2)(b) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act prohibits abortion of a foetus after 20 weeks of pregnancy.
Advocate Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, appearing for the girl, had urged that, as has been done in many similar cases by the Supreme Court, a medical board should be constituted to evaluate her status and submit a report if it is safe for her to undergo an abortion at this stage.
Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd