Dengue Death: Manipal Hospital told to pay Rs 21 lakh Compensation

Published On 2019-04-10 14:24 GMT   |   Update On 2022-11-26 10:55 GMT

"Treatment is opposed to the guidelines issued by WHO and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and that the use of brufen reveals lack of care and knowledge"


Davanagere: The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has recently directed a city-based Manipal hospital to pay compensation of Rs 21 lakh for performing deficiency in providing treatment to minor suffering from dengue.


Bangalore Mirror reports about the case stating that forum said that the hospital did not follow the WHO and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare guidelines during the treatment.


The case concerned a 12-year old patient, who was admitted to Bapuji Child Health Research Institute and Research Centre, Davanagere, on 14th May 2012. He was doing fine in the course of treatment but to gain better healthcare services he was shifted to Manipal Hospital on the next day.


The diagnosis report at Manipal Hospital mentioned that the patient was suffering from dengue shock syndrome and was kept on ventilator. He was then sedated and nasogastric tubes were inserted to his body.


The patient was given brufen, oralis, fenatyl citrate, zinetac among other drugs and fluids but no signs of recovery were observed.


On 16th May, he went through a cardiac arrest and was given defibrillation or controlled electric shock treatment. The next day, more tubes were inserted into his body to draw haemorrhagic fluids.  The Additional Intravenous therapy (IV) fluids and medicines like calcium gluconate, sodium bicarbonate was administered to him and blood and urine tests were performed.


Based on the test report, a sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis (SLED) treatment was given to the patient. The patient was further given a Continuous Veno-venous Haemodialysis (CVVHD) treatment and more medications when no recovery was observed.


The doctors further speculated intra-abdominal bleeding and conducted laparostomy surgery .


Even after conducting all the procedures, the child could not recover and died on 17th May in the afternoon.


It was declared by the hospital that the death happened due to viral haemorrhagic fever with shock, metabolic acidosis, and cardio-respiratory arrest.


Read Also: Failure to diagnose Fetal deformity: Doctors directed to pay Rs 36 lakh Compensation


The father of the deceased filed a complaint in the Consumer Forum against Dr Ramakrishnan, paediatrician, Manipal Hospital and alleged medical negligence on the part of the doctor and the hospital,reports Bangalore Mirror.


The hospital denied any such allegations. The hospital further alleged that the complaint was filed for monetary benefit.


The Consumer Court went through the entire matter and gave its order regarding the case. It pointed out that –




  • The suggestion of the purchase of additional drugs at the time of the death of the child raises questions on the genuineness of the treatment.

  • There was no record maintained by the hospital bout the time, details and dosage of medication according to the age and weight of the child.

  • There was no record of what was found out after the laparostomy surgery.


The order stated:



'Treatment is opposed to the guidelines issued by WHO and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and that the use of brufen reveals lack of care and knowledge'.

The court further directed the hospital to pay compensation of Rs 21,37,036 in the case of the untimely death of the minor due to medical negligence. This includes Rs 15,00,000 as compensation and the bill of Rs 6,37,036 lakh, which was handed over to the parents after the two days of treatment.


A spokesperson from the hospital told Mirror, "We are in receipt of the order by the Honourable Commission and in the process of examining it and shall do the needful. The hospital said that the child was admitted for five days for possible pneumonia with respiratory distress and later developed multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and that the treatment given is in accordance with the Standard Medical Practice."
Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News