ARP with DBBM helps circumvent additional grafting need during implant placement

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-01-12 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-01-13 09:13 GMT

ARP with DBBM helps circumvent additional grafting needed during implant placement suggests a new study published in the International Journal of Implant Dentistry.A study was conducted to assess the dimensional establishment of a bony envelope after alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in order to estimate the surgical feasibility of standard...

Login or Register to read the full article

ARP with DBBM helps circumvent additional grafting needed during implant placement suggests a new study published in the International Journal of Implant Dentistry.

A study was conducted to assess the dimensional establishment of a bony envelope after alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in order to estimate the surgical feasibility of standard diameter implant placement without any additional augmentation methods.

PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL databases were searched for suitable titles and abstracts using PICO elements. Inclusion criteria were as follows: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising at least ten systemically healthy patients; test groups comprised placement of (collagenated) DBBM w/o membrane and control groups of no grafting, respectively. Selected abstracts were checked regarding their suitability, followed by full-text screening and subsequent statistical data analysis. Probabilities and number needed to treat (NNT) for implant placement without any further need of bone graft were calculated.

Results

• The initial database search identified 2583 studies.

• Finally, nine studies with a total of 177 implants placed after ARP with DBBM and 130 implants after SH were included for the quantitative and qualitative evaluation.

• A mean difference of 1.13 mm in ridge width in favour of ARP with DBBM could be calculated throughout all included studies

• Probabilities for implant placement with 2 mm surrounding bone requiring theoretically no further bone augmentation ranged from 6 to 19% depending on implant diameter.

ARP employing DBBM reduces ridge shrinkage on average by 1.13 mm and improves the possibility to place standard diameter implants with up to 2 mm circumferential bone housing; however, no ARP would have been necessary or additional augmentative bone interventions are still required in 4 out of 5 cases.

Reference:

Fischer, K.R., Solderer, A., Arlt, K. et al. Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Implant Dent 8, 56 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00453-z

Keywords:

International Journal of Implant Dentistry, Fischer, K.R., Solderer, A., Arlt, K, Bone envelope, implant, placement, alveolar, ridge, preservation, systematic, review, and meta-analysis.

Tags:    
Article Source : International Journal of Implant Dentistry

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News