Developmental disability patients not at higher infection risk after third molar extractions, suggests study
Patients with developmental disability do not at higher rates of infections after third molar extractions, suggests study published in the Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery.
Patients with developmental disabilities may exhibit behavioural problems or be unable to maintain proper hygiene, potentially placing them at greater risk for infection following the extraction of third molars. The purpose of this study was to estimate and compare the risk for surgical site infection after third molar removal between patients with and without developmental disabilities.
This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent extraction of all four-third molars at Boston Children's Hospital from August 1, 2021, to July 31, 2023. Patients were excluded if all four-third molars were not present or if all four-third molars were not extracted during one visit. The primary predictor variable was developmental disability status. Subjects were grouped by developmental disability, coded as present or absent. The primary outcome variable was diagnosis of a postoperative surgical site infection. Secondary outcomes included time to follow-up and infection treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 1,896 subjects were evaluated. There were 236 subjects in the developmental disability group (72.5% male [n = 171] mean age of 19.3 ± 2.7 years) and 1,660 in the nondevelopmental disability group (53.4% female [n = 887] mean age of 19.0 ± 2.3 years). Subjects in the developmental disability group more frequently underwent their extractions in the operating room under general anesthesia (57.6% [n = 136] P < .001). The overall postoperative infection rate was 2.7% (n = 52). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of infection between the developmental disability group (0.8% [n = 2]) and the nondevelopmental disability group (3.0% [n = 50]) (P = .057). There was no significant difference in time to follow-up between subjects who were and were not diagnosed with an infection (6.26 ± 9.39 weeks vs 4.69 ± 10.95 weeks, P = .434) or for subjects in the developmental disability and nondevelopmental disability group who had an infection (2.64 ± 0.30 weeks vs 6.43 ± 9.76 weeks, P = .588). Patients with a developmental disability do not exhibit higher rates of postoperative infections following third molar extractions when compared to patients without developmental disabilities.
Reference:
Britt MC, Sepe EA, Green MA. Third Molar Extractions in Patients With Developmental Disabilities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Aug 22:S0278-2391(24)00742-0. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2024.08.012. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39245262.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.