Diabetes mellitus (DM) may affect  the physical and mechanical properties of dentin, which could  potentially have an impact on root canal procedures. The dentin of  patients suffering from both diabetic type 1 (D1), diabetic type 2  (D2) exhibited an increased amount of dentin removed compared with  the nondiabetic dentin specimens, reported a recent study published  in the Journal of Endodontics.
    The team of researchers led by  Mohammad Ali Saghiri at the Biomaterial and Prosthodontic Laboratory,  Department of Restorative Dentistry, Rutgers School of Dental  Medicine, Newark, New Jersey aimed to compare the amount of dentin  removed by an endodontic rotary file, comparing dentin from diabetic  patients with dentin from control patients under laboratory  conditions.
    The amount of dentin removed was  tested using new F3 ProTaper (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues,  Switzerland) files applied against the surface of prepared dentin  discs for 3 different groups-
    a. diabetic type 1 (D1),   
    b. diabetic type 2 (D2), and   
    c. nondiabetic (normal).
    The dentin removed was determined  by measuring the depth of penetration of the file using a digital  caliper and by measuring the weight loss.   
    Data were analyzed using  Kolmogorov-Smirnov, analysis of variance, post hoc Tukey, and Pearson  correlation tests (P < .05).
    The following findings were  highlighted-
    a. Significantly more dentin was  removed, and the penetration of the F3 instrument was significantly  higher (P < .05) in diabetes mellitus specimens.   
    b. The statistical analysis  revealed significant differences between the type 1 and type 2  diabetes and normal groups (P < .05) for the weight loss of the  specimen as well as the penetration depth at point B (P < .05).   
    c. Both the weight loss and depth  of penetration showed a very high positive correlation (P < .05).
    As a result, the authors  concluded that the dentin of patients suffering from both D1 and D2  exhibited an increased amount of dentin removed compared with the  nondiabetic dentin specimens.   
    This can be observed by the  increased penetration of the rotary instruments into dentin. Under  certain circumstances, this may impact instrumentation, increasing  procedural accidents and leading to subsequent weakening of root  canal–treated teeth in diabetic patients.
    For further reading, log in to:
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2021.03.019
 
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.