Immediate implant placement protocol and early and delayed placement protocols have comparable aesthetics results

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-08-20 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-08-21 06:35 GMT

Aesthetics and clinical results of immediate implant placement protocol comparable to early and delayed placement protocols suggests a new study published in the Evidence-Based Dentistry The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the clinical efficacy of the immediate implant placement (IIP) protocol in the aesthetic zone with early dental implant placement...

Login or Register to read the full article

Aesthetics and clinical results of immediate implant placement protocol comparable to early and delayed placement protocols suggests a new study published in the Evidence-Based Dentistry

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the clinical efficacy of the immediate implant placement (IIP) protocol in the aesthetic zone with early dental implant placement (EIP) protocol.

Electronic databases MEDLINE (via OVID), EMBASE (via OVID), ISI Web of Science core collection, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar were searched for the studies comparing the two clinical protocols. Randomised controlled trials were included. Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (ROB-2) was used to assess the quality of included students.

Results

A total of six studies were selected. Implant failure was observed at 3.84%, 9.3%, and 4.45% in three studies while in the other studies, no implant failure was reported. Meta-analysis of four studies showed no statistically significant difference in the vertical bone levels between IIP and EIP (148 patients), mean difference (MD)0.10 [95% CI: –0.29 to 0.091.32] P > 0.05. Meta-analysis of two studies showed the probing depth between IIP versus EIP was not significantly different (100 patients), mean difference(MD)-0.00 [95% CI; –0.23 to 0.23]; P > 0.05. The pink aesthetic score (PES) was improved in EIP as compared to IIP with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).

The available evidence supports the clinical efficacy of the IIP protocol. Present findings indicate aesthetics and clinical results of immediate implant placement protocol are comparable to early and delayed placement protocols. Therefore, future research with long-term follow-up is warranted.

Reference:

Asghar, A.M., Sadaf, D. & Ahmad, M.Z. Comparing clinical outcomes of immediate implant placement with early implant placement in healthy adult patients requiring single-tooth replacement in the aesthetic zone: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Evid Based Dent 24, 93 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00902-7

Keywords:

Aesthetics, clinical, results, immediate, implant, placement, protocol, comparable, early, delayed, placement protocols, Asghar, A.M., Sadaf, D. & Ahmad, M.Z, Evidence-Based Dentistry

Tags:    
Article Source : Evidence-Based Dentistry

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News