Occlusal devices fabricated using fully digital workflow have better occlusal adjustment versus those fabricated using an analog workflow
Occlusal devices fabricated using a fully digital workflow have better occlusal adjustment versus those fabricated using an analogue workflow suggests a new study published in the Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Study was done to evaluate the volumetric changes on occlusal surface of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) occlusal devices fabricated following a fully digital workflow after occlusal adjustment, compared to those fabricated with an analog workflow.
Eight participants were included in this clinical pilot study, receiving two different occlusal devices fabricated with two different workflows, fully analog and fully digital. Every occlusal device was scanned before and after the occlusal adjustments to compare the volumetric changes using a reverse engineering software program. Moreover, three independent evaluators assessed a semi-quantitative and qualitative comparison using visual analog scale and dichotomous evaluation. The Shapiro–Wilk test was performed to validate normal distribution assumption, and a dependent t-Student test for paired variables was used to determine statistically significant differences (p-value < 0.05).
Results
The root mean square value was extracted from the 3-Dimensional (3D) analysis of the occlusal devices. The average values of the root mean square were higher for the analogic technique (0.23 ± 0.10 mm) than the digital technique (0.14 ± 0.07 mm) but the differences were not statistically significant (paired t-Student test; p = 0.106) between the two fabrication techniques. The semiquantitative visual analog scale values between the impression for the digital (5.08 ± 2.4 cm) and analog (3.80 ± 3.3 cm) technique were significant (p < 0.001), and statistically significant differences values were assessed for evaluator 3 compared to the other evaluators (p < 0.05). However, the three evaluators agreed on the qualitative dichotomous evaluation in 62% of the cases, and at least two evaluators agreed in 100% of the evaluations.
Occlusal devices fabricated following a fully digital workflow resulted in fewer occlusal adjustments, as they could be a valid alternative to those fabricated following an analog workflow. Fabricated occlusal devices following a fully digital workflow could have some advantages over analog workflow such reduce occlusal adjustments at delivery appointment, which can result in reduced chair time and therefore increased comfort for the patient and clinician.
Reference:
Blasi, A, Henarejos-Domingo, V, Palacios-Bañuelos, R, Vidal-Ponsoda, C, Aparicio, C, Roig, M. CAD-CAM and analog occlusal splints comparison based on the number of occlusal adjustments. 3D analysis of the volumetric changes: A pilot study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023; 1-8. doi:10.1111/jerd.13080
Keywords:
Occlusal, devices, fabricated, using, fully, digital, workflow, better, occlusal, adjustment, versus, fabricated, using, analogue, workflow, Blasi, A, Henarejos-Domingo, V, Palacios-Bañuelos, R, Vidal-Ponsoda, C, Aparicio, C, Roig, M. CAD-CAM, Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.