Rapid high-intensity light-curing not recommended for flowable bulk-fill composites: Study
According to a recent research published in the Journal of Dentistry, it has been observed that rapid high-intensity light-curing cannot be recommended for flowable bulk-fill composites since it may compromise the tooth-restoration interface.
Rapid high-intensity light-curing of dental resin composites is attractive from a clinical standpoint due to the prospect of time-savings
MatejPar and colleagues from the Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia carried out the present study with the objective to investigate the effect of rapid high-intensity light-curing on the marginal integrity of four bulk-fill composites, including two materials specifically designed for high-intensity curing.
Class V cavities were prepared on buccal surfaces of intact human molars with simulated pulpal pressure, filled in a single increment and light-cured using a conventional (10 s @ 1,340 mW/cm2) or high-intensity (3 s @ 3,440 mW/cm2) protocol.
The restorations were subjected to thermo-mechanical loading (TML) comprising 1,200,000 mechanical loading cycles and 3,000 thermocycles. Quantitative margin analysis was performed before and after TML using a scanning electron microscope, and the marginal integrity was expressed as percentage of continuous margin (PCM).
The following results were found-
a. All PCM values measured before TML were statistically similar regardless of the material and curing protocol (p>0.05).
b. A statistically significant effect of the curing protocol (p = 0.021) was identified only after TML for one material.
c. PCM was significantly diminished by TML (p<0.001) for most combinations of material and curing protocol.
d. The PCM values of the sculptable composites after TML were statistically similar regardless of the curing protocol (p>0.05).
e. Compared to these values, significantly lower PCM after TML was identified for the flowable composites cured with the high-intensity protocol (p = 0.001–0.045).
Hence, the authors concluded that "in most cases, high-intensity and conventional curing generally led to similar marginal integrity. Although all of the investigated composites initially performed similarly well, the flowable composites light-cured using the high-intensity protocol showed a significantly inferior marginal integrity compared to the sculptable composites after loading."
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.