Standard anti-infective mechanical treatment may reduce peri-implant mucositis

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-01-09 12:30 GMT   |   Update On 2024-01-09 12:30 GMT

Standard anti-infective mechanical treatment may reduce peri-implant mucositis suggests a new study published in the Journal of Periodontology.Peri-implant mucositis (PIM) is a pathological precursor of peri-implantitis, but its pattern of conversion to peri-implantitis is unclear and complicated to diagnose clinically, while none of the available protocols yield complete disease resolution....

Login or Register to read the full article

Standard anti-infective mechanical treatment may reduce peri-implant mucositis suggests a new study published in the Journal of Periodontology.

Peri-implant mucositis (PIM) is a pathological precursor of peri-implantitis, but its pattern of conversion to peri-implantitis is unclear and complicated to diagnose clinically, while none of the available protocols yield complete disease resolution. The aim of this study was the evaluation of PIM responsiveness to standard anti-infective mechanical treatment (AIMT) at clinical and biomarker levels, and estimation of the diagnostic capacity of bone markers as surrogate endpoints and predictors.

Systemically healthy outpatients presenting one implant exhibiting clinical signs of inflammation confined within the soft tissue (PIM) and one healthy control (HC) implant at a non-adjacent position were included. Clinical parameters and peri-implant crevicular fluid samples were collected baseline and 6 months following mechanical therapy, to assess the levels of RANKL, OPG, and IGFBP2. PIM clustering was performed using machine learning algorithms.

Results

Overall, 38 patients met the inclusion criteria. Therapy resulted in the reduction of all clinical and biological indicators, but respective values remained significantly higher compared to HC. Clinical examination noted 30% disease resolution at the 6-month follow-up, while 43% showed no active bone resorption. OPG showed positive prognostic value for treatment outcome, while the clustering based on active bone resorption did not differ in terms of therapeutic effectiveness.

AIMT is effective in reducing the clinical and biological indicators of PIM, but complete clinical resolution was achieved in only 30% of the cases. Around one third of PIM patients exhibited active bone resorption bellow clinical detectability that was not associated with disease progression and poor treatment responsiveness.

Reference:

Rakic M, Tatic Z, Radovanovic S, Petkovic-Curcin A, Vojvodic D, Monje A. Resolution of peri-implant mucositis following standard treatment: A prospective split-mouth study. J Periodontol. 2023; 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.23-0507

Keywords:

Standard, anti-infective, mechanical, treatment, may, reduce, peri-implant, mucositis,Rakic M, Tatic Z, Radovanovic S, Petkovic-Curcin A, Vojvodic D, Monje A, Journal of periodontology

Tags:    
Article Source : Journal of Periodontology

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News