Ultrathin Zirconia Laminate Veneers Fabricated Using Conventional and Speed Sintering have similar esthetics and strength: Study
Ultrathin Zirconia Laminate Veneers Fabricated Using Conventional and Speed Sintering have similar esthetics and strength suggests a new study published in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
The application of highly translucent multilayered zirconia ceramic in minimally invasive esthetic dentistry allows the achievement of both esthetics and strength with minimal thickness. Clinical studies that have assessed the performance of zirconia ultrathin veneers sintered with conventional and speed procedures are lacking. This clinical study aimed to evaluate the effect of speed sintering processes on the translucency and clinical performance of zirconia laminate veneers. Four participants had their teeth restored with 32 ultra translucent zirconia laminate veneers. Based on the zirconia sintering procedure, the participants were randomly allocated into 2 groups. The teeth were prepared by selective reduction over trial restorations. Zirconia veneers were milled from multilayer zirconia blanks and sintered either by speed sintering or conventional sintering as specified by the manufacturer’s recommendations. The intaglio surface of the veneers was airborne-particle abraded with 50-μm aluminium-oxide, and the veneers were then adhesively bonded to the teeth with translucent light-polymerizing resin cement. The modified California Dental Association (CDA)/Ryge criteria were used to assess participants at baseline and every 3 months for 12 months: the translucency and the colour difference of the tooth before and after veneer restoration were evaluated. For statistical analysis, the Pearson chi-squared test, independent t-test, and paired t-test were used (α=.05).
Results: Translucency and colour differences were significantly higher in the conventionally sintered group (P<.05). No restorations were lost. No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in the CDA/Ryge criteria or colour parameter after follow-up intervals (P>.05). The primary qualitative changes observed at the final recall were marginal integrity and marginal discolouration. The colour match and zirconia surface were rated Alfa. After 1 year of follow-up, both conventional and speed-sintered ultrathin zirconia laminates showed satisfactory functional, esthetic, and colour stability outcomes.
Reference:
Yousry M, Hammad I, El Halawani M, Aboushelib M. Randomized clinical trial of zirconia laminate veneers sintered by using conventional versus speed process: 1-year follow-up. J Prosthet Dent. 2024 May 31:S0022-3913(24)00352-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.04.031. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38824110.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.