Amenamevir's Effective and Safe for Treatment of Recurrent Herpes Labialis Confirms Phase 3 Trial

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-11-19 01:30 GMT   |   Update On 2024-11-19 06:37 GMT

Japan: A recent phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study published in the Journal of Dermatology has shown that a single, patient-initiated dose of amenamevir can significantly shorten the healing time for recurrent herpes labialis (cold sores).

Herpes labialis, a common viral infection caused by the herpes simplex virus (HSV-1), affects millions globally, causing painful lesions that can recur multiple times a year. Recurrent herpes labialis can be a source of significant discomfort and distress, especially when outbreaks are frequent. While antiviral medications like acyclovir and valacyclovir are commonly used to manage outbreaks, they typically require multiple doses over several days. Amenamevir (ASP2151) is a novel antiviral drug, a non-nucleoside analog, that works by inhibiting the activities of helicase and primase enzymes, which are crucial for the replication of herpes viral DNA.

Against the above background, Makoto Kawashima, Department of Dermatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan, and colleagues assessed the efficacy and safety of a single, patient-initiated dose of amenamevir for treating recurrent herpes labialis by conducting a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.

For this purpose, the researchers randomly assigned adult, immunocompetent patients with recurrent herpes labialis, who were able to recognize prodromal symptoms, to self-administer either amenamevir 1200 mg or a placebo. The treatment was initiated within six hours of prodromal symptom onset.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to complete healing of all herpes labialis lesions in the modified intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included time to crusting of lesions, resolution of pain associated with herpes labialis, the proportion of patients with aborted lesions, and time to resolution of other subjective symptoms. The modified intention-to-treat population included 298 patients who self-initiated amenamevir and 307 patients who received the placebo, excluding those with aborted lesions.

The study led to the following findings:

  • Amenamevir was superior to placebo for the primary endpoint, with a median time to healing of all lesions of 5.1 days for amenamevir versus 5.5 days for placebo (hazard ratio 1.24).
  • Time to crusting of all lesions was significantly shorter with amenamevir compared to placebo.
  • No significant differences were observed between the two groups for other secondary outcomes.
  • Treatment-emergent adverse events were generally mild in both groups.
  • Two moderate adverse events occurred, but they were unrelated to the study treatment.
  • No severe adverse events were reported.

"A single patient-initiated dose of 1200 mg of amenamevir taken within 6 hours of the onset of prodromal symptoms significantly reduced the time to complete lesion healing in recurrent herpes labialis, when compared to a placebo, without any clinically significant safety issues," the researchers concluded.

Reference:

Kawashima, M., Watanabe, D., Fujio, K., & Komazaki, H. (2023). A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating a single, patient-initiated dose of amenamevir for recurrent herpes labialis. The Journal of Dermatology, 50(3), 311-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.16608


Tags:    
Article Source : The Journal of Dermatology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News