Contezolid as effective as linezolid for treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-04-04 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2022-04-07 05:59 GMT

Contezolid 800 mg q12h is as effective as linezolid for treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs) in adults, but safer than linezolid in terms of haematological abnormalities, according to a recent study Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Contezolid is a novel oxazolidinone antibacterial agent for managing infections caused by aerobic and anaerobic...

Login or Register to read the full article

Contezolid 800 mg q12h is as effective as linezolid for treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs) in adults, but safer than linezolid in terms of haematological abnormalities, according to a recent study Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Contezolid is a novel oxazolidinone antibacterial agent for managing infections caused by aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant strains. A Phase III, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of contezolid versus linezolid in adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs).

Adult patients with cSSTI were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to receive contezolid 800 mg or linezolid 600 mg q12h for 7–14 days. Clinical cure rate and safety were assessed at the test of cure (TOC) visit in the full analysis set (FAS) and clinical evaluable (CE) population. Non-inferiority was defined as a lower limit of the 95% CI around the treatment difference of clinical cure rates greater than −10%. Chinadrugtrials.org.cn registration identifier: CTR20150855.

Results of the study are:

Clinical cure rates at TOC indicated non-inferiority of contezolid 800 mg to linezolid 600 mg q12h for patients in the FAS with clinical evaluation, FAS, and CE populations: 92.8% (271/292) versus 93.4% (284/304) (difference −0.6%, 95% CI: −4.7% to 3.5%), 81.4% (271/333) versus 84.5% (284/336) (difference −3.1%, 95% CI: −8.8% to 2.6%) and 90.5% (267/295) versus 90.1% (282/313) (difference 0.4%, 95% CI: −4.3% to 5.1%). Contezolid and linezolid showed similar efficacy for the cSSTIs caused by methicillin-susceptible or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Contezolid demonstrated significant lower incidence of leucopenia (0.3% versus 3.4%) and thrombocytopenia (0% versus 2.3%) than linezolid. The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable between the two groups.

Thus, Contezolid 800 mg q12h is as effective as linezolid for treatment of cSSTIs in adults, but safer than linezolid in terms of haematological abnormalities.

Reference:

A Phase III multicentre, randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral contezolid versus linezolid in adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections by Xu Zhao, et al. published in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Keywords: Xu Zhao, Haihui Huang, Hong Yuan, Zhengyu Yuan, Yingyuan Zhang, efficacy and safety, of oral contezolid, linezolid, oral contezolid versus linezolid for soft tissue infections, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


Tags:    
Article Source : Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News